2010
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x1010400705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Treasure in Leisure Activities: Fostering Resilience in Young People who are Blind

Abstract: Because leisure activities are often viewed as optional, their value to people with disabilities may not be recognized. This study explored the benefits of leisure activities for eight young people who are blind. These activities provided them with supportive relationships, a desirable identity, experiences of power and control, and experiences of social justice. They enabled the young people we studied to thrive despite adversity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After the first iteration of our search, we decided to expand our inclusion criteriapapers still had to address the population of interest (i.e., children and young people, with some of the sample having a disability), but they were also considered if they were resiliencebased but not evaluated (e.g., Alvord & Grados, 2005;Burka, 2007;Ellis, Braff, & Hutchinson, 2001), if their link to the resilience literature was not explicitly stated in the introduction, despite reporting a program that clearly could be conceptualised as increasing resilience (e.g., Ferreyra, 2001;Morison, Bromfield, & Cameron, 2003;Pelchat, 2010), and in some cases if they were not strictly "interventions", for example describing the benefit of individual resilience-building activities that were not part of an intervention (Jessup, Cornell, & Bundy, 2010), or existing service provision that was not part of a research project (Evans & Plumridge, 2007;Morison et al, 2003). With a redefined set of inclusion criteria, the second iteration identified 23 of the papers as suitable for inclusion in this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the first iteration of our search, we decided to expand our inclusion criteriapapers still had to address the population of interest (i.e., children and young people, with some of the sample having a disability), but they were also considered if they were resiliencebased but not evaluated (e.g., Alvord & Grados, 2005;Burka, 2007;Ellis, Braff, & Hutchinson, 2001), if their link to the resilience literature was not explicitly stated in the introduction, despite reporting a program that clearly could be conceptualised as increasing resilience (e.g., Ferreyra, 2001;Morison, Bromfield, & Cameron, 2003;Pelchat, 2010), and in some cases if they were not strictly "interventions", for example describing the benefit of individual resilience-building activities that were not part of an intervention (Jessup, Cornell, & Bundy, 2010), or existing service provision that was not part of a research project (Evans & Plumridge, 2007;Morison et al, 2003). With a redefined set of inclusion criteria, the second iteration identified 23 of the papers as suitable for inclusion in this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several interventions had a specific focus for enhancing resilience including: prevention elements such as mental health (Firth et al, 2013;Stallard et al, 2005;Storch et al, 2012) and substance use (Ferreyra, 2001); learning new skills such as problem-solving, social and life skills (Alvord & Grados, 2005;Ellis et al, 2001;Ferreyra, 2001;Macpherson et al, in press;Mears & Stevenson, 2006;Theron, 2006); leisure, outdoor activities, and hobbies (Bloemhoff, 2006;Buckner et al, 2005;Burka, 2007;Ellis et al, 2001;Evans & Plumridge, 2007;Jessup et al, 2010); creative therapies including art/music (Macpherson et al, in press;Theron, 2006); and work experience (Woodier, 2011). Length and intensity was very wide-ranging -from one-off sessions of 1 to 4 hours (Bloemhoff, 2006;Mu & Chang, 2010) to weekly sessions over 2 to 3 years (Ferreyra, 2001;Woodier, 2011; see Table 1).…”
Section: What Did the Studies Do Exactly For How Long And With Whatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to providing an enjoyable time, leisure time activities help encouraging peer acceptance (Fischer & Barkley, 2006;Jessup, Cornell, & Bundy, 2010;King, Law, Hurley, Petrenchik, & Schwellnus, 2010). It can be said that participants have a chance to develop their social skills like communicating with their peers and sharing things with them as well as enjoying themselves thanks to the activities they have chosen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluations of proneness to injuries resulting from falls in people with visual impairment have been carried out very rarely. People suffering from complete blindness or partial visual impairment are examined primarily for their physical fitness and posture (Bolach et al, 2007, Bolach, Bolach & Józefowski, 2009Patel et al, 2009;Jessup, Cornel & Bundy, 2010;Rutkowska, Bednarczuk, Skowroński, 2010). The occurrence of injuries resulting from falls is generally evaluated in seniors or healthy children, without comparing their results with the results acquired by children suffering from various conditions and dysfunctions (Tinetti & Williams, 1997;Kalina, Kalina & Klukowski, 1998;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%