“…After the first iteration of our search, we decided to expand our inclusion criteriapapers still had to address the population of interest (i.e., children and young people, with some of the sample having a disability), but they were also considered if they were resiliencebased but not evaluated (e.g., Alvord & Grados, 2005;Burka, 2007;Ellis, Braff, & Hutchinson, 2001), if their link to the resilience literature was not explicitly stated in the introduction, despite reporting a program that clearly could be conceptualised as increasing resilience (e.g., Ferreyra, 2001;Morison, Bromfield, & Cameron, 2003;Pelchat, 2010), and in some cases if they were not strictly "interventions", for example describing the benefit of individual resilience-building activities that were not part of an intervention (Jessup, Cornell, & Bundy, 2010), or existing service provision that was not part of a research project (Evans & Plumridge, 2007;Morison et al, 2003). With a redefined set of inclusion criteria, the second iteration identified 23 of the papers as suitable for inclusion in this review.…”