The Travel Behaviour of Polish Women and Adaptation of Transport Systems to Their Needs

Abstract

Although knowledge of women’s travel behaviours is essential to guarantee equality in transport, there is still a lack of awareness of gender-differentiated behaviour and gender issues are not often incorporated into urban policy. The aim of the article is to present a first attempt at a wider-scale diagnosis of women’s travel behaviours and needs as well as existing barriers to transportation access for woman in Poland, with respect to current findings. Documents on history, culture, social factors and labour market data were reviewed to indicate factors that may explain travel behaviours. The data of the Travel Studies for seven Polish cities were analysed to diagnose gender differences in travel. Public policies and initiatives were analysed to examine the level of awareness of women’s needs and the adaptation of transport to these needs. The results proved that the greatest differences in the trip purpose was observed for age group 25-49, in which women make more trips for errands, and men for work. Women travel more, which is observed among 25–59-year-olds, if the main occupation is considered. Women travel more on foot and by public transport, while men by private car and the results indicate that it is mostly visible for people aged 25-59. The age groups 39-49 for women and 30-49 for men are the most dependent on the car. The differences may be explained by historical, cultural and social factors, and these factors can be also seen as barriers to achieving equal access to transport. A low level of awareness of women’s mobility needs is one of the reasons that Polish transport systems are not fully adapted to their needs.

Mobility in the Developing Country. The Case Study of Bangkok Metropolitan Region

“…On the other hand, individual vehicle owner found it difficult to travel with consistent traffic jams and high pollution levels. These findings support the previous literatures among the other countries and were found to be related with studies from European countries [40][41][42], developing economies such as Mexico [43][44] and Asian countries [45]. The comparative analysis between the other countries enhances the adequacy towards the adoption of accurate governmental initiatives to enhance the ease and comfort of the daily commuters in Thailand.…”

Who Does Light Rail Serve? Examining Gendered Mobilities and Light-Rail Transit in Montreal, Canada

“…Because gender-differentiated roles place a higher burden on women for family-care activities ( 18 – 21 ), women’s mobilities tend to be much more complex, often encompassing multiple travel modes ( 17 , 22 , 23 ). Although women’s trips are often shorter than men’s ( 12 ), on average, women make significantly more trips ( 24 , 25 ), and engage in more non-work-related travel ( 24 ). As for travel patterns, the literature finds that women tend to walk more than men do ( 24 ) and that they rely more heavily on public transit ( 25 , 26 ).…”

“…Although women’s trips are often shorter than men’s ( 12 ), on average, women make significantly more trips ( 24 , 25 ), and engage in more non-work-related travel ( 24 ). As for travel patterns, the literature finds that women tend to walk more than men do ( 24 ) and that they rely more heavily on public transit ( 25 , 26 ).…”

Social Justice in Urban Public Transportation: A User-Centric Analysis of Fares in Portoviejo, Ecuador

“…Moreover, evidence shows that mobility deterioration due to fare increases disproportionately affects women, who constitute the majority of public transport users (Babinard & Scott, 2011;Nosal Hoy & Puławska-Obiedowska, 2021); children and students (Asplund & Pyddoke, 2022;Nguyen & Pojani, 2022); and peripheral urban communities (Valdes et al, 2022), due to longer travel distances and heightened sensitivity to potential frequency reductions or route disappearances (Parks, 2006). Age, bus travel frequency, and attitudes towards environmental degradation are factors that shape willingness to accept higher fares (Clarfield, 2016;Stradling et al, 2007).…”