2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-021-01082-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transport–structural correspondence across the nematic phase transition probed by elasto X-ray diffraction

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recalling that the elastoresistivity , the observed behavior necessarily reflects the temperature and doping dependence of both of these quantities, g T , x and . For underdoped compositions, it has been recently established that the resistivity anisotropy becomes increasingly sensitive to nematic order 23 and nematic fluctuations 19 as x is increased from zero towards x c , so it is certainly not unreasonable to anticipate that g T , x also varies as a function of x on the overdoped side of the phase diagram. Raman scattering measurements reveal that the dynamic nematic susceptibility grows as the composition is tuned towards x c from the overdoped side of the phase diagram 24 , so it is clear that the observed power-law divergence of the elastoresistivity cannot be solely due to doping dependence of g T , x .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recalling that the elastoresistivity , the observed behavior necessarily reflects the temperature and doping dependence of both of these quantities, g T , x and . For underdoped compositions, it has been recently established that the resistivity anisotropy becomes increasingly sensitive to nematic order 23 and nematic fluctuations 19 as x is increased from zero towards x c , so it is certainly not unreasonable to anticipate that g T , x also varies as a function of x on the overdoped side of the phase diagram. Raman scattering measurements reveal that the dynamic nematic susceptibility grows as the composition is tuned towards x c from the overdoped side of the phase diagram 24 , so it is clear that the observed power-law divergence of the elastoresistivity cannot be solely due to doping dependence of g T , x .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also measured the B 2g -symmetry spontaneous orthorhombicity ɛ S , which is a proxy of the nematic order (see Materials and Methods and fig. S2) ( 31 ). Under applied tension, the magnitude of ɛ S is suppressed by up to 30%, coinciding with a dramatic decrease in the resistivity (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A piezo-actuator uniaxial stress device (Razorbill Instruments, CS-100) was used to provide in situ stress. The built-in capacitance strain gauge was used to determine the nominal strain εxxnom as in ( 31 ). Sample chamber constraints prevented the measurement of εxxnom for data presented in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should motivate a refinement of its real space structure and spectroscopic studies under uniaxial stress. Another promising avenue is the recently developed in-situ combination of strain-dependent x-ray diffraction and electrical transport measurements 49 . Further elastoresistance studies in CDW systems, where a Curie-Weiss dependence is generally not observed 39,50 , are also highly desirable to investigate the different mechanisms at play.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%