2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(03)80779-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transobturator slingtape uratape: Anatomical dangers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The original design of this technique, called transobturator tape, described by Delorme [14] in 2001, was to place the tape between the two obturator foramen, from outside to inside. The reported results are very close to those reported in most of the observational series of tension-free vaginal tape [15][16][17][18], and objective cure rates are as good as those quoted for the randomized controlled trials of colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape [19,20]. In 2003, a novel surgical technique was described by de Leval [21], with the passage of the tape through the obturator foramens from inside to outside, called tension-free vaginal tape inside out (TVT-O).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original design of this technique, called transobturator tape, described by Delorme [14] in 2001, was to place the tape between the two obturator foramen, from outside to inside. The reported results are very close to those reported in most of the observational series of tension-free vaginal tape [15][16][17][18], and objective cure rates are as good as those quoted for the randomized controlled trials of colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape [19,20]. In 2003, a novel surgical technique was described by de Leval [21], with the passage of the tape through the obturator foramens from inside to outside, called tension-free vaginal tape inside out (TVT-O).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast with the anatomical investigations performed by Delmas et al [18], who found that the obturator tape placed outside in traverses the levator ani muscle and the arch of the pelvic fascia; the trajectory of the inside out transobturator tape (TVT-O) is different. After the dissections, the inside out obturator tape could not be seen in the retropubic space at any time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, bladder perforation during TOT was reported in 3 of 61 patients [21]. Theoretically, the transobturator tape does not penetrate the retropubic space, but the tip of the tunneller can injure the bladder, the bladder neck, or the urethra if its course is misaligned or in an oblique direction [22]. We performed cystoscopy on all TOT patients, but there was no incidence of bladder perforation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Outside-in TOT is safer than TVT in terms of bladder perforation or urinary tract injury because the digital dissection is performed internally from the incised vaginal margin to the ischiopubic region, and the urethral periphery is thus well dissected. However, the risk of bladder perforation remains [20][21][22] , as has been described in a number of reports [17,[23][24][25][26] . Minalia et al [24] reported 2 cases of bladder perforation on routine cystoscopy where there was no clinical suspicion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%