The transmission mechanism of credit support policies in the euro area

Abstract

We use an original monthly dataset of 131 individual euro area banks to examine the effectiveness and transmission mechanism of the Eurosystem's credit support policies since the start of the crisis. First, we show that these policies have indeed been succesful in stimulating the credit flow of banks to the private sector. Second, we find support for the "bank lending view" of monetary transmission. Specifically, the policies have had a greater impact on loan supply of banks that are more constrained to obtain unsecured external funding, i.e. small banks (size effect), banks with less liquid balance sheets (liquidity effect), banks that depend more on wholesale funding (retail effect) and low-capitalized banks (capital effect). The role of bank capital is, however, ambiguous. Besides the above favorable direct effect on loan supply, lower levels of bank capitalization at the same time mitigate the size, retail and liquidity effects of the policies. The drag on the other channels has even been dominant during the sample period, i.e. better capitalized banks have on average responded more to the credit support policies of the Eurosystem as a result of more favourable size, retail and liquidity effects.

Low Interest Rates and the Distribution of Household Debt

“…We then use data on the average interest rate on mortgages for each bank at the country level. The data is from the NBB's survey on interest rates (MFI Interest Rate statistics, MIR) and has been used by Boeckx et al (2020) to assess the transmission of monetary policy. For a given bank interest rate r bt we compute the local interest rate as…”

On the Negatives of Negative Interest Rates and the Positives of Exemption Thresholds

“…Bräuning and Wu (2017) find an increase in loan volumes due to NIR. Boeckx et al (2020) analyze the effect of the ECB's credit-easing policies, which also include NIR -and find increased bank lending volumes due to these policies. However, they do not disentangle the effect arising from NIR and other measures.…”

Modeling Outcomes of Unconventional Monetary Policy

“…Engen et al (2015) suggest that the net stimulus to real activity and inflation was limited by the gradual nature of the changes in policy expectations and term premium effects, as well as by a persistent belief on the part of the public that the pace of recovery would be much faster than proved to be the case [2]. Boeckx et al (2016) emphasize that balance shocks have a positive effect on economic activity and prices [3]. Eser, Schwaab (2016) assess the yield impact of asset purchases within the European Central Bank‫׳‬s (ECB) Securities Markets Program (SMP) in five euro area sovereign bond markets from 2010-2011.…”