1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00755709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transitional object reconsidered: Some sociocultural variations and their implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transitional object and transitional phenomena serve as an adaptive self soothing device that provides security and reduces stress when the care giver is no longer available at all times to satisfy the child's needs. Moreover, the transitional object arises in the context of the infant being left alone, particularly at bedtime (Applegate, 1989). Thus it would be consistent that good enough mothering would promote transitional object use in a cultural context where the view of individual independence promotes sleeping alone in infancy, and makes it less likely in another cultural context such as Japan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The transitional object and transitional phenomena serve as an adaptive self soothing device that provides security and reduces stress when the care giver is no longer available at all times to satisfy the child's needs. Moreover, the transitional object arises in the context of the infant being left alone, particularly at bedtime (Applegate, 1989). Thus it would be consistent that good enough mothering would promote transitional object use in a cultural context where the view of individual independence promotes sleeping alone in infancy, and makes it less likely in another cultural context such as Japan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A plethora of theoretical speculation on transitional object/phenomena has appeared in the literature subsequent to Winnicott's (1953) conceptualization. The child's attachment to an inanimate object has been studied in its relationship to: separation-individualization Stevenson & Wlnnicott, 1954;Gaddini & Gaddini, 1970;Mahler, 1972;Mahler, Pine and Bergman, 1975); ego and body ego development (Coppolillo, 1967;Tolpin, 1971;Brody, 1980); the development of creativity, cognition, and symbol formation (Rose, 1978, Hong, 1978; temperament and personality (Cohen & Clark, 1984;Morris, Gunderson & Zanarini, 1986;Haslam, 1992); and culture (Hanchett & Casale, 1976;Hong & Townes, 1976;Applegate, 1989).…”
Section: General Research Related To Transitional Objectsphenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…storytelling, lullabies) or to assess how variations in early transitional object use affect later developmental phases. Applegate (1989) stressed the need for more culturally sensitive research to assess whether the use of transitional objects is a universal phenomenon, as Winnicott had suggested, and to explore selected family patterns for achieving transitional relatedness. He states:…”
Section: Transitional Objectdphenomena: Gender and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of transitional object use in adolescents may provide insight into their emotional states, wellbeing, and tendency to seek or avoid help for personal and emotional problems, and transitional objects may act as an easily observed marker for recognizing psychological distress in adolescents (Bachar et al, 1998). Winnicott (1953) believed the use of a transitional object to be a universal phenomenon, but some researchers have suggested that transitional object use is more prevalent in the West due to young children sleeping alone at younger ages (Applegate, 1989;Hong & Townes, 1976) and needing a substitute for the caregiver. There has been limited research evidence in this area, with only one previous study considering transitional object usage in an Asian population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%