2008
DOI: 10.1007/bf03217474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transition to formal thinking in mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
137
0
29

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
137
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that students simply guessed their answers in the conceptually-oriented test since the given test is a multiple choice type. Procedural and conceptual knowledge are complementary (Bossé & Bahr, 2008) since procedural knowledge is part of conceptual knowledge (Tall, 2008).…”
Section: Pretest and Post-test Performance Of Participants In The Expmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that students simply guessed their answers in the conceptually-oriented test since the given test is a multiple choice type. Procedural and conceptual knowledge are complementary (Bossé & Bahr, 2008) since procedural knowledge is part of conceptual knowledge (Tall, 2008).…”
Section: Pretest and Post-test Performance Of Participants In The Expmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may also be disparities in approaches to thinking about mathematics at secondary and tertiary levels. Tall (2008) suggests that as students' progress from secondary to tertiary mathematics, their thinking must move from a symbolic world to a more formal world. However if tertiary courses are trying to build thinking in the formal world with students who are primarily symbolic thinkers, then difficulties will arise (Hong et al, 2009).…”
Section: Insert Table 1: Project Maths Implementation Timelinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The facility for building sophisticated knowledge structure is based on a phenomenal array of neuronal facilities for perception and action that are present in the new-born child and develop rapidly through experience in the early years. Tall (2008) refers to these abilities as 'set-befores' (because they are set before birth as part of our genetic inheritance and develop through usage) as opposed to 'met-befores' that arise as a result of previous experience and may be supportive or problematic when that experience is used in new contexts. He hypothesizes that three major set-befores give rise to three distinct developments of mathematical thinking and proof through:…”
Section: Theories Of Cognitive Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full cognitive development of formal proof from initial perceptions of objects and actions to axiomatic mathematics can be formulated in terms of three distinct forms of development (Tall, 2004(Tall, , 2008:…”
Section: A Global Framework For the Development Of Mathematical Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%