The transition in Dutch water management

Abstract

Over the past decades the Dutch people have been confronted with severe waterrelated problems, which are the result of an unsustainable water system, arising from human interventions in the physical infrastructure of the water system and the water management style. The claims of housing, industry, infrastructure and agriculture have resulted in increasing pressure on the water system. The continuous subsidence of soil and climate change has put pressure on the land. Hence, the nature and magnitude of water-related problems have changed. Longitudinal research of relevant national policy documents reveals that the water management regime has changed its water management style over the past thirty years from a technocratic scientific style towards an integral and participatory style. We have investigated if the historical development in Dutch Water management can be characterized as a transition. Based on longitudinal research through an integrated systems analysis, document research and expert interviews, we have reconstructed the historical narrative by using the transition concepts of multi-level and multi-phase. This research indicates that the shift in Dutch Water management can be characterized as a transition. This transition is currently in the takeoff stage and near the acceleration stage. This is a crucial stage as long as the considerable differences between the strategic macro-vision and the practical implementation at the micro-level remains. As long as these levels are not compatible (modulation), the transition will not be completed successfully. Transition management as multi-level governance model should therefore be adopted to facilitate the modulation.

Shock events and flood risk management: a media analysis of the institutional long-term effects of flood events in the Netherlands and Poland

“…For the Polish case, the research seems to have generated some new insights because little research was previously being conducted. However, for the Dutch case as well, we could extend existing research (e.g., Driessen and De Gier 1999, Van der Brugge et al 2005, Huitema and Meijerink 2007, Van Herk et al 2015 by refining the interrelation between shock events, framing, and institutional change through an analysis of the endogenous processes. We analyzed why some frames generate institutional stability or change and subsequently why this change was more permanent or not.…”

Tackling wicked environmental problems: The discourse and its influence on praxis in Scotland

“…A further theme accepts the indefinability of wicked problems offering no way around 158 (Sharman, 2009;van der Brugge et al, 2005;van Latesteijn & Rabbinge, 2012;Palmer, 159 2012). We denote this as the resignatory approach (strategy 1c, Fig 1).…”

From niche level innovations to age-friendly homes and neighbourhoods: a multi-level analysis of challenges, barriers and solutions

“…Verbong and Loorbach 2012), agriculture (e.g. Klerkx and Leeuwis 2009) and water and waste management (Van derBrugge, Rotmans, and Loorbach 2005), recently insights from these fields are applied and considered promising in analysing health systems as well (Van Raak 2010;Broerse and Bunders 2010).…”