1988
DOI: 10.2307/1163082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transition from Single-Sex to Coeducational High Schools: Effects on Multiple Dimensions of Self-Concept and on Academic Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a coed setting, traditional gender stereotyping about perceived competence would favor boys in Mathematics and favor girls in English. A reduction in traditional stereotyping in single-gender settings was suggested by an earlier Australian study about gender differences in the Self-Description Questionnaire for students at government coed and private Catholic single-gender primary schools (Marsh, Smith, & Barnes, 1988). Similarly, in the United States, adolescents at single-gender Catholic high schools were "less likely to see themselves in sexstereotyped adult roles" (Lee & Bryk, 1986, p. 394).…”
Section: Traditional Gender Stereotyping and School Typementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a coed setting, traditional gender stereotyping about perceived competence would favor boys in Mathematics and favor girls in English. A reduction in traditional stereotyping in single-gender settings was suggested by an earlier Australian study about gender differences in the Self-Description Questionnaire for students at government coed and private Catholic single-gender primary schools (Marsh, Smith, & Barnes, 1988). Similarly, in the United States, adolescents at single-gender Catholic high schools were "less likely to see themselves in sexstereotyped adult roles" (Lee & Bryk, 1986, p. 394).…”
Section: Traditional Gender Stereotyping and School Typementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The most common studies were done in schools in England, Australia, and Canada, and these often dealt with the pros and cons o f coeducation from a social perspective (Ryan, 1974 (Marsh, Smith, Marsh, and Owens, 1988) in wMch data were collected on students who attended single-sex Mgh schools that were transformed into coeducational institutions. School type was found to have little or no effect on school performance.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a five year longitudinal study done in Australia (Marsh, et al, 1988), data were collected on students who attended single-sex Mgh schools that were transformed into coeducational institutions. Control students who remained in single-sex schools exMbited modestly Mgher self-concepts, although tMs was ascribed to the depressing influence of the disruption caused by the transition process.…”
Section: Afetk£_gut£omementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of studies are now available which compare the educational achievement of children attending single-sex and mixed secondary schools. The results of these studies have been inconsistent, with some providing support for the benefits of mixed schools (Marsh, 1989;Marsh, Smith, Marsh, & Owens, 1988), 79 while others support single-sex education (Astin, 1977;Lee & Bryk, 1986;Riordan, 1985), and yet others finding no achievement differences between children attending single-sex and coeducational schools (Miller & Dale, 1974;Rutter, Maughan, Mortimore, & Outson, 1979). This issue has been further complicated by claims that school type may have and differential effect on girls and boys achievement, with boys tending to perform better in a mixed school environment, while girls tend to fare better in a single-sex school environment (Finn, 1980) Gender parity in formal education is not only a major concern for parents, educators and policy makers, but also a basic human right, a key indicator of achievement of education for all, and a source of economic growth (Bank, Delmont and Marshall, 2007).…”
Section: Background To the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%