The transition from animal to human culture—simulating the social protocell hypothesis

Human societies are no doubt complex. They are characterized by division of labour, multiple hierarchies, intricate communication networks and transport systems. These phenomena and others have led scholars to propose that human society may be, or may become, a new hierarchical level that may dominate the individual humans within it, similar to the relations between an organism and its cells, or an ant colony and its members. Recent discussions of the possibility of this major evolutionary transition in individuality (ETI) raise interesting and controversial questions that are explored in the present issue from four different complementary perspectives. (i) The general theory of ETIs. (ii) The unique aspects of cultural evolution. (iii) The evolutionary history and pre-history of humans. (iv) Specific routes of a possible human ETI. Each perspective uses different tools provided by different disciplines: biology, anthropology, cultural evolution, systems theory, psychology, economy, linguistics and philosophy of science. Altogether, this issue provides a broad and rich application of the notion of ETI to human past, present and perhaps also future evolution. It presents important case studies, new theoretical results and novel questions for future research. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Human socio-cultural evolution in light of evolutionary transitions’.

Section: Line D: Realizations Of the Notion Of Human Evolutionary Tra...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Human socio-cultural evolution in light of evolutionary transitions: introduction to the theme issue

Carmel

Shavit

Lamm

et al. 2023

“…Such models could draw on existing models of human ETIs (e.g. [38,102,116]) and endogenous cultural group selection [24]. In addition, we might study the processes and constraints on previous ETIs in other systems.…”

Section: Research Agendamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These proposals differ on whether the transition hinges on individuality or inheritance. For example, while protolanguage may have appeared in Homo erectus and catalysed human evolution [37], the 'social protocell' model [36] depends on differential reproduction of cultural groups with heritable institutions [38]. For Powers et al [35], the emergence of culturally determined institutions marks the central transition.…”

Section: Human Evolutionary Ratchets Help Explain the Anthropocenementioning

confidence: 99%

Characteristic processes of human evolution caused the Anthropocene and may obstruct its global solutions

Waring,

Wood,

Szathmáry

2023

We propose that the global environmental crises of the Anthropocene are the outcome of a ratcheting process in long-term human evolution which has favoured groups of increased size and greater environmental exploitation. To explore this hypothesis, we review the changes in the human ecological niche. Evidence indicates the growth of the human niche has been facilitated by group-level cultural traits for environmental control. Following this logic, sustaining the biosphere under intense human use will probably require global cultural traits, including legal and technical systems. We investigate the conditions for the evolution of global cultural traits. We estimate that our species does not exhibit adequate population structure to evolve these traits. Our analysis suggests that characteristic patterns of human group-level cultural evolution created the Anthropocene and will work against global collective solutions to the environmental challenges it poses. We illustrate the implications of this theory with alternative evolutionary paths for humanity. We conclude that our species must alter longstanding patterns of cultural evolution to avoid environmental disaster and escalating between-group competition. We propose an applied research and policy programme with the goal of avoiding these outcomes. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolution and sustainability: gathering the strands for an Anthropocene synthesis’.

“…Possibly later, humans evolved in-group/out-group psychology and norm psychology, perhaps as a result of cultural group selection [ 19 – 21 ]. Another possibility is that the early evolution of culturally integrated societies derived from processes of coevolution of institutions (such as language), biological systems and cultural evolutionary individuals [ 22 , 23 ]. The integration of norm psychology and SIT that we conjecture raises questions and difficulties with this standard division.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The interplay of social identity and norm psychology in the evolution of human groups

Bar-On

Lamm

2023

People's attitudes towards social norms play a crucial role in understanding group behaviour. Norm psychology accounts focus on processes of norm internalization that influence people's norm-following attitudes but pay considerably less attention to social identity and group identification processes. Social identity theory in contrast studies group identity but works with a relatively thin and instrumental notion of social norms. We argue that to best understand both sets of phenomena, it is important to integrate the insights of both approaches. Social status, social identity and social norms are considered separate phenomena in evolutionary accounts. We discuss assumptions and views that support this separation, and suggest an integrated view of our own. We argue that we should be open to the early origins of human social complexity, and conjecture that the longer that the human social world involved multi-level societies the more probable it is that norm psychology and social identity interacted in rich ways. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Human socio-cultural evolution in light of evolutionary transitions’.