2007
DOI: 10.1086/510834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transit Light Curve Project. III. Tres Transits of TrES‐1

Abstract: We present z band photometry of three consecutive transits of the exoplanet TrES-1, with an accuracy of 0.15% and a cadence of 40 seconds. We improve upon estimates of the system parameters, finding in particular that the planetary radius is 1.081 ± 0.029 R Jup and the stellar radius is 0.811 ± 0.020 R ⊙ . The uncertainties include both the statistical error and the systematic error arising from the uncertainty in the stellar mass. The transit times are determined to within about 15 seconds, and allow us to re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
129
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(62 reference statements)
10
129
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We fit both Equation (1) and the transit curve to the first 10 hours of data simultaneously using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method (e.g., Tegmark et al 2004;Ford 2005;Winn et al 2007a;Burke et al 2007). We exclude the first 30 minutes of data from our fit, as the ramp is particularly steep during this time, and set the uncertainties on individual points equal to the rms variance of the time series between 0.8 and 1.0 days after the start of the observations (this is the middle of the time There is still a small ramp at early times, but its amplitude is smaller than the equivalent ramp with no preflash and the ramp converges to a constant value within the first 10 hr of observations.…”
Section: Eclipse Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fit both Equation (1) and the transit curve to the first 10 hours of data simultaneously using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method (e.g., Tegmark et al 2004;Ford 2005;Winn et al 2007a;Burke et al 2007). We exclude the first 30 minutes of data from our fit, as the ramp is particularly steep during this time, and set the uncertainties on individual points equal to the rms variance of the time series between 0.8 and 1.0 days after the start of the observations (this is the middle of the time There is still a small ramp at early times, but its amplitude is smaller than the equivalent ramp with no preflash and the ramp converges to a constant value within the first 10 hr of observations.…”
Section: Eclipse Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following transit timing analysis we included several published mid-transit observations, by Charbonneau et al (2005), Winn et al (2007) and Hrudková et al (2009) for TrES-1 (Table 2), and for TrES-2 by Holman et al (2007) (Table 3). We considered only O-C times with errors below 60 s, which led to the rejection of some O-C values from Charbonneau et al (2005).…”
Section: Light Curve Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After normalization of the flux we fit a theoretical light curve using the system parameters by Winn et al (2007) (Table 4) Table 5. The transit of epoch 40.5 (forced e = 0) according to the ephemeris given by Winn et al (2007) is even a secondary transit observed with the Spitzer Space Telescope by Charbonneau et al (2005). With all available transit times in Table 5 we determined the transit and secondary-eclipse timing residuals for TrES-1.…”
Section: Determination Of the Midtransit Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With all available transit times in Table 5 we determined the transit and secondary-eclipse timing residuals for TrES-1. The calculated times (using the ephemeris of Winn et al 2007) have been subtracted from the observed times. The resulting O-C is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Determination Of the Midtransit Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation