2016
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1158769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transformation of an online learning community from an organised facility to an organic fraternity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As note by Lyashenko & Frolova (2014) and Moreira, Henriques, Goulão, & Barros (2017), virtual platforms enforce collaboration of adults and young learners in universities. In this regard, it is important to promote a scenario that facilitates the creation of social and collaborative learning environments (Zapata, 2011;Zagalsky, Feliciano, Storey, Zhao & Wang, 2015;Fields, Lai, Gibbs, Kirk & Vermunt, 2016) or being part of a learning cyber community (Murua, Cacheiro & Gallego, 2014), to encourage student participation in online seminars (Falloon, 2011). Examining articles published between 2011 and 2015 about interaction in distance education environments, the results revealed that researchers continue to pay attention to interaction, mainly learner-learner (Karataş, Yılmaz, Dikmen, Ermiş, & Gurbuz, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As note by Lyashenko & Frolova (2014) and Moreira, Henriques, Goulão, & Barros (2017), virtual platforms enforce collaboration of adults and young learners in universities. In this regard, it is important to promote a scenario that facilitates the creation of social and collaborative learning environments (Zapata, 2011;Zagalsky, Feliciano, Storey, Zhao & Wang, 2015;Fields, Lai, Gibbs, Kirk & Vermunt, 2016) or being part of a learning cyber community (Murua, Cacheiro & Gallego, 2014), to encourage student participation in online seminars (Falloon, 2011). Examining articles published between 2011 and 2015 about interaction in distance education environments, the results revealed that researchers continue to pay attention to interaction, mainly learner-learner (Karataş, Yılmaz, Dikmen, Ermiş, & Gurbuz, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its inception, CMC has been recognized as an important learning resource that can support learner communication and shape the formation of learning cultures (McAteer, Tolmie, Duffy, & Corbett, 1997). In particular, asynchronous online discussions are often used to facilitate idea sharing, resolve student confusion, coordinate cognitive actions, support negotiation, scaffold group knowledge building, and maintain social bonds within a learner community (Fields et al, 2016;Resnick, Säljö, Pontecorvo, & Burge, 1997;Stahl, 2006). In successful cases, online discussions can engender positive student experiences by enabling discussion that is active, interactive, constructive, and hereby conducive to learning (Chi & Menekse, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Social Participation In Online Discussmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptive-correlational method of research was utilized in the study to determine the acceptance of integrating a course management system [8], [9] in the graduate school and its effect on students' learning. A correlational research systematically investigates the relationship among variables as well as in determining the cause and effect relationship [10]. The study made use of a quantitative research approach in analyzing and understanding the effects of acceptance of integrating a course management system on students' learning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%