2014
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transcriptional response of prokaryotes to phytoplankton‐derived dissolved organic matter in seawater

Abstract: To better understand the functional responses in prokaryotes to dissolved organic matter (DOM), we compared the transcriptional pattern of natural prokaryotic communities grown in continuous cultures on seawater amended with phytoplankton-derived DOM. Metatranscriptomic reads were classified taxonomically (by genomic binning) and functionally (using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), and the relative gene expression of individual taxa (genome bins) was compared with the total community response. In the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sampling and further processing of the metatranscriptomic analyses have been described previously (Beier et al, 2014). After 15 days, samples for metatranscriptomic analyses were siphoned from the incubation vessels into a combusted glass bottle.…”
Section: Sampling For Metatranscriptomic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Sampling and further processing of the metatranscriptomic analyses have been described previously (Beier et al, 2014). After 15 days, samples for metatranscriptomic analyses were siphoned from the incubation vessels into a combusted glass bottle.…”
Section: Sampling For Metatranscriptomic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was removed from the extracted RNA using the turboDNAse (Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX, USA). To further Samples marked with an asterisk were lost during the experimental procedure or excluded from data analyses for reasons given in the text (this figure has been published previously, Beier et al, 2014).…”
Section: Sampling For Metatranscriptomic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bacteria and Archaea are the dominant degraders of DOM (Carlson, 2002), but the specific taxa, genes and molecular mechanisms most responsible for DOM metabolism remain relatively obscure. Recently, several culture-independent studies have begun to identify the microbial community members that respond to DOM enrichment, though the majority of these studies have focused on DOM isolated from phytoplankton cultures (Beier, Rivers, Moran, & Obernosterer, 2014;Landa et al, 2013;Nelson & Carlson, 2012;Poretsky, Sun, Mou, & Moran, 2010;Sarmento & Gasol, 2012;Sharma et al, 2014) which is presumed to be more labile than HMW DOM collected in oligotrophic environments. This is likely because of the presence of labile proteins and amino acids (Sarmento et al, 2013) and homopolysaccharides (Meon & Kirchman, 2001) in phytoplankton DOM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%