2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transcriptional Coregulators TIF2 and SRC-1 Regulate Energy Homeostasis by Modulating Mitochondrial Respiration in Skeletal Muscles

Abstract: Summary The two p160 transcriptional co-regulator family members SRC-1 and TIF2 have important metabolic functions in white and brown adipose tissues, as well as in the liver. To analyze TIF2 cell-autonomous functions in skeletal muscles, we generated TIF2(i)skm-/- mice, in which TIF2 was selectively ablated in skeletal muscle myofibers at adulthood. We found that increased mitochondrial uncoupling in skeletal muscle myocytes protected these mice from decreased muscle oxidative capacities induced by sedentarin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Present data also suggest the implication of nuclear coactivators such as CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1, nuclear receptor coactivator MED1 and steroid receptor coactivator (NcoA6) that were simultaneously upregulated in SA juveniles. Experiments in transgenic mice have indeed indicated that these nuclear coreceptors might be involved in muscle energy metabolism [31,32]. Interestingly, MED1 was recently shown to dynamically interact with nuclear T 3 R in the activation of brown-fat-specific thermogenic UCP1 [33] further underlying its role in metabolic adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present data also suggest the implication of nuclear coactivators such as CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1, nuclear receptor coactivator MED1 and steroid receptor coactivator (NcoA6) that were simultaneously upregulated in SA juveniles. Experiments in transgenic mice have indeed indicated that these nuclear coreceptors might be involved in muscle energy metabolism [31,32]. Interestingly, MED1 was recently shown to dynamically interact with nuclear T 3 R in the activation of brown-fat-specific thermogenic UCP1 [33] further underlying its role in metabolic adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to the alterations in BAT or skeletal muscle energetics, where SRC1 competes with SRC2 to regulate genes controlling energy expenditure and uncoupling (13,30). In comparison, the SRC1 ASOs did not alter BAT or muscle expression, and SRC1 ASO treatment did not impact weight gain in either chow-fed or high-fat-fed rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…SRC1 ASO treatment increased glucose Ϫ/Ϫ mice are prone to diet-induced obesity (13,26,30). To determine whether SRC1 ASO treatment alters weight gain and diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance, rats were treated with control or SRC1 ASO and fed a high-fat diet for 4 wk.…”
Section: Src1 Aso Treatment Increases Peripheral Insulin Sensitivity mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that SRC-2(Ϫ/Ϫ) and SRC-3(Ϫ/Ϫ) mice are protected from diet-induced obesity, whereas SRC-1(Ϫ/Ϫ) mice are more susceptible to weight gain (Picard et al, 2002;Coste et al, 2008). Whole-body SRC-2(Ϫ/Ϫ) and SRC-3(Ϫ/Ϫ) mice, as well as skeletal muscle-specific SRC-2 knockout mice, are characterized by increased energy expenditure and higher body temperatures, responses that seem to be mediated by increased UCP expression and activity in mitochondria of both brown adipose tissue and skeletal muscle (Picard et al, 2002;Coste et al, 2008;Duteil et al, 2010). Normally, SRC-2 and SRC-3 help to maintain optimal efficiency between mitochondrial respiration and ATP synthesis by antagonizing the actions of SRC-1 and/or PGC-1␣, both of which promote UCP expression and thermogenesis.…”
Section: Modifications Of Transcriptional Metabolic Regulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the absence of SRC-2 or SRC-3 leaves SRC-1 unopposed, generating an increase in energy expenditure and activation of mitochondrial biogenesis. In fact, knocking out SRC-2 specifically in muscle is sufficient to protect against high-fat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance, suggesting that decreasing SRC-2 and/or increasing SRC-1 in skeletal muscle may represent viable strategies for counteracting nutritional overload metabolic disorders (Duteil et al, 2010).…”
Section: Modifications Of Transcriptional Metabolic Regulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%