2000
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.149.2.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transcriptional Coactivator Cbp Interacts with β-Catenin to Activate Gene Expression

Abstract: β-Catenin plays a pivotal role in the transcriptional activation of Wnt-responsive genes by binding to TCF/LEF transcription factors. Although it has been suggested that the COOH-terminal region of β-catenin functions as an activation domain, the mechanisms of activation remain unclear. To screen for potential transcriptional coactivators that bind to the COOH-terminal region of β-catenin, we used a novel yeast two-hybrid system, the Ras recruitment system (RRS) that detects protein–protein interactions at the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
360
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 434 publications
(376 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
13
360
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical interaction between b-catenin and both c-Jun and c-Fos was demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitations in vivo and by glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays in vitro. The co-immunoprecipitation experiments do not directly prove that the b-catenin interaction with AP-1 proteins was direct, because b-catenin has been reported previously to bind other proteins that are also potential partners of c-Jun and c-Fos, such as CBP/p300 (Miyagishi et al, 2000;Takemaru and Moon, 2000;Harris and Peifer, 2005) or the LIM-only protein (Morlon and Sassone-Corsi, 2003). However, our in vitro pull-down assays clearly demonstrate a direct association between the armadillo repeats of b-catenin and the DNA-binding domain of c-Jun and the C-terminal domain of b-catenin with the N-terminal region of c-Fos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The physical interaction between b-catenin and both c-Jun and c-Fos was demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitations in vivo and by glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays in vitro. The co-immunoprecipitation experiments do not directly prove that the b-catenin interaction with AP-1 proteins was direct, because b-catenin has been reported previously to bind other proteins that are also potential partners of c-Jun and c-Fos, such as CBP/p300 (Miyagishi et al, 2000;Takemaru and Moon, 2000;Harris and Peifer, 2005) or the LIM-only protein (Morlon and Sassone-Corsi, 2003). However, our in vitro pull-down assays clearly demonstrate a direct association between the armadillo repeats of b-catenin and the DNA-binding domain of c-Jun and the C-terminal domain of b-catenin with the N-terminal region of c-Fos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Binding of b-catenin to LEF/TCF causes displacement of core-repressor complexes containing histone deacetylases (Billin et al, 2000), and heterodimerization that allows interaction with the C-terminal transactivation domain of b-catenin leading ultimately to the activation of transcription of Wntresponsive genes Moon et al, 2002). The coactivator function of b-catenin is induced by recruitment of the basal transcription machinery (Hecht et al, 1999) and is enhanced by synergistic cooperation with a number of other proteins such as coactivators, (Zhurinsky et al, 2000;Martin et al, 2002;Grueneberg et al, 2003;Wei et al, 2003) or proteins involved in chromatin remodeling and histone modification (Hecht et al, 2000;Miyagishi et al, 2000;Sun et al, 2000;Takemaru and Moon, 2000;Barker et al, 2001). Not surprisingly, mounting evidence indicate that b-catenin is able to cross-talk with a variety of signalling cascades, such as those involving Rac GTPase, forkhead box O transcription factors or transforming growth factor (TGF)b (Eger et al, 2004;Esufali and Bapat, 2004;Chakladar et al, 2005;Essers et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Further study is necessary to delineate the role, if any, of TLE factors in the de-repression of Wnt activity in butyrate-treated HCT-116 cells. In addition, we determined that overexpression of CBP, implicated in the control of Wnt activity, 50,53 does not influence butyrate modulation of the Wnt signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells (data not shown). In summary, the mechanisms by which Tcf cofactors may influence Wnt activity in butyrate-treated HCT-116 cells are as yet undetermined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may occur through displacement of Groucho from TCF/LEF and recruitment of the histone acetylase CBP/p300. CBP may bind to the β-catenin-TCF complex as a co-activator [26,27], a hypothesis that remains to be tested directly. Another activator, Brg-1, is a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex which, with CBP, may induce chromatin remodeling that favors target gene transcription [28].…”
Section: Signaling In the Nucleusmentioning
confidence: 99%