2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.23.217646
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trans-Ancestral Genomic Architecture of Glycaemic Traits

Abstract: Glycaemic traits are used to diagnose and monitor type 2 diabetes, and cardiometabolic health. To date, most genetic studies of glycaemic traits have focused on individuals of European ancestry. Here, we aggregated genome-wide association studies in up to 281,416 individuals without diabetes (30% non-European ancestry) with fasting glucose, 2h-glucose post-challenge, glycated haemoglobin, and fasting insulin data. Trans-ancestry and single-ancestry meta-analyses identified 242 loci (99 novel; P<5×10-8), 80%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

8
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, our findings are based on data from GWAS conducted in subjects of European ancestry. Hence, our results and conclusions might not extend to other ethnic populations although, evidence from a recent, large, ancestrally diverse GWAS meta‐analysis of glycaemic traits suggests that similar results might also be expected (Chen et al, 2021). Thirdly, two‐sample MR studies assume that the SNP‐exposure (in this case LTL) associations are also present in the outcome dataset(s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Secondly, our findings are based on data from GWAS conducted in subjects of European ancestry. Hence, our results and conclusions might not extend to other ethnic populations although, evidence from a recent, large, ancestrally diverse GWAS meta‐analysis of glycaemic traits suggests that similar results might also be expected (Chen et al, 2021). Thirdly, two‐sample MR studies assume that the SNP‐exposure (in this case LTL) associations are also present in the outcome dataset(s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…We selected 17 cardiometabolic traits and diseases that cluster clinically with metabolic syndrome, obesity, diabetes, and their complications: type 1 diabetes [ 34 ], type 2 diabetes [ 35 ], hemoglobin A1c [ 36 ], fasting glucose adjusted for body mass index (BMI) [ 36 ], fasting insulin adjusted for BMI [ 36 ], BMI [ 37 ], waist–hip ratio adjusted for BMI [ 38 ], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [ 39 ], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [ 39 ], triglycerides [ 39 ], systolic blood pressure [ 40 ], diastolic blood pressure [ 40 ], creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [ 41 ], chronic kidney disease [ 41 ], coronary artery disease [ 42 ], any stroke [ 43 ], and C-reactive protein (CRP) [ 44 ], a nonspecific biomarker of inflammation that can be elevated in people with high cardiometabolic risk. As our study was conducted to narrowly test an a priori hypothesis, we did not have a prespecified analysis plan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extracted association summary statistics from published large-scale GWAS meta-analysis to generate sets of genetic instruments for 17 cardiometabolic diseases and traits, type 1 diabetes 34 , type 2 diabetes 35 , hemoglobin A1c 36 , fasting glucose adjusted for body mass index (BMI) 36 , fasting insulin adjusted for BMI 36 , BMI 37 , waist-hip ratio 38 , low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 39 , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 39 , triglycerides 39 , systolic blood pressure 40 , diastolic blood pressure 40 , creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 41 , chronic kidney disease 41 coronary artery disease 42 , any stroke 43 , and c-reactive protein 44 (CRP), a non-specific biomarker of inflammation that can be elevated in people with high cardiometabolic risk. We used genetic variants associated with these exposures at genome-wide significance ( p <5×10 -8 ) and excluded those that were not represented in the COVID-19 outcome GWAS datasets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%