The Waitangi Tribunal: Te Roopu Whakamana I Te Tiriti O Waitangi 2004
DOI: 10.7810/9781877242328_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trajectory of the Waitangi Tribunal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature began to evidence the systemic discrimination Māori faced in almost all areas of life, including education, employment, the legal system and politics, and disproportionate rates of poverty, ill-health, incarceration, and low educational attainment compared with Pākehā (European New Zealanders) [171][172][173][174]. The Waitangi Tribunal (in combination with the Māori cultural renaissance of the 1980s and 1990s) has served as a conduit for Māori to reassert their sovereignty and utilise their distinctive tribal identities to recover their lands and seek compensation for historical grievance and harm [175][176][177]. Many iwi and hap ū (including Te Roroa and Te Uri o Hau) have now settled treaty claims and established 'postsettlement' tribal organisations to manage their lands and waters in accordance with local preferences [178,179], participate in local and regional governance, and provide health, educational, housing, and other social services to whānau [180,181].…”
Section: Research Context: Amorphous Subjectivities Inequality and Ag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature began to evidence the systemic discrimination Māori faced in almost all areas of life, including education, employment, the legal system and politics, and disproportionate rates of poverty, ill-health, incarceration, and low educational attainment compared with Pākehā (European New Zealanders) [171][172][173][174]. The Waitangi Tribunal (in combination with the Māori cultural renaissance of the 1980s and 1990s) has served as a conduit for Māori to reassert their sovereignty and utilise their distinctive tribal identities to recover their lands and seek compensation for historical grievance and harm [175][176][177]. Many iwi and hap ū (including Te Roroa and Te Uri o Hau) have now settled treaty claims and established 'postsettlement' tribal organisations to manage their lands and waters in accordance with local preferences [178,179], participate in local and regional governance, and provide health, educational, housing, and other social services to whānau [180,181].…”
Section: Research Context: Amorphous Subjectivities Inequality and Ag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a deep concern that important kin relationships have been partially replaced by legal notions of property, as an amalgamation of business and charitable goals have come to define post-settlement tribal interests. Fears that the corporatisation of iwi in the post-settlement environment may become a form of clientelism have also been expressed by several other commentators (see Sharp, 2004;Seuffert, 2005, andPoata-Smith, 2004). Poata-Smith contends that, 'The corporatisation of iwi has serious implications for governance structures, leadership, representation and accountability within iwi, hapu and urban Maori communities.…”
Section: Economic Development and The Rise Of Tribal Corporationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Treaty debate is fuelled by ambiguity. It is stressed that the Treaty is a significant contributor to the historical and political landscape of New Zealand (Sharp 2004).…”
Section: Treaty Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%