2015
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.12151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tragic Legality of Racial Violence: Reconstruction, Race and Emergency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The argument to follow proceeds with two caveats. First, a more general discussion of emergency powers might also acknowledge times when states have invoked such authority to uphold rights or equality when those entrusted with doing so prove unable or unwilling (see, e.g., Kato, 2015). The focus here on ESMs and equality is framed more narrowly.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The argument to follow proceeds with two caveats. First, a more general discussion of emergency powers might also acknowledge times when states have invoked such authority to uphold rights or equality when those entrusted with doing so prove unable or unwilling (see, e.g., Kato, 2015). The focus here on ESMs and equality is framed more narrowly.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I use the concept of constitutional dictatorship as a heuristic, as a way of thinking more explicitly about constitutional violence than is customary in comparative constitutional law. My goal is to stage an analytical irruption-by relating the emergency to the everyday, and both to coloniality (see also Kato 2015Kato , 2016Meierhenrich & Tushnet forthcoming). My decision to lead into the subject matter via a circuitous route was deliberate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%