2015
DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2015.2.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The trade-off between DES and SD in modelling military manpower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Guerry and De Feyter (2009) suggest that a Markovian force structure model is an interesting tool for gaining insights (e.g., through what-if analysis), they acknowledge that it has some critical limitations. argues that system dynamics is most suitable in cases where the effects of feedback are important to consider; while prefer the flexibility of discrete event simulation, Jajo (2015) prefers discrete event simulation for its ability to track and monitor individuals' attributes and for its suitability for modeling small populations.…”
Section: Modeling Force Structures and Training Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Guerry and De Feyter (2009) suggest that a Markovian force structure model is an interesting tool for gaining insights (e.g., through what-if analysis), they acknowledge that it has some critical limitations. argues that system dynamics is most suitable in cases where the effects of feedback are important to consider; while prefer the flexibility of discrete event simulation, Jajo (2015) prefers discrete event simulation for its ability to track and monitor individuals' attributes and for its suitability for modeling small populations.…”
Section: Modeling Force Structures and Training Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some practitioners have discussed the suitability of system dynamics versus DES approaches, both for military workforce planning problems (Jajo 2015; and in the broader field of modeling and simulation (Chahal and Eldabi 2008;Tako and Robinson 2009;Greasley 2009). It is generally accepted that system dynamics is a suitable approach for strategic-level problems where the goal is to understand the overall functioning of the system and the interactions within it, whereas discrete event simulation offers a higher level of granularity for problems at the operational level (Helal and Rabelo 2017).…”
Section: Modeling Force Structures and Training Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further information on the methods’ comparison, readers are referred to Barton et al 2 , Brailsford et al, 3 Hester and Tolk, 4 and Jajo. 5…”
Section: Considerations Of Review Scope and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%