The traction requirements of female and male basketball players

Barrons, Zach B.; Esposito, Michael; Stefanyshyn, Darren J.; Wannop, John W.

doi:10.1080/19424280.2022.2141899

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This model was selected because it has the same drop and midsole height as the experimental conditions but does not have a carbon fiber plate to increase the LBS. Previous studies have shown that these characteristics can influence the RE (Barrons et al, 2023; Bertschy et al, 2023).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Relationship between advanced footwear technology longitudinal bending stiffness and energy cost of running

Rodrigo-Carranza,

Hoogkamer,

González-Ravé

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction/PurposeShoe longitudinal bending stiffness (LBS) is often considered to influence running economy (RE) and thus, running performance. However, previous results are mixed and LBS levels have not been studied in advanced footwear technology (AFT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the isolated effects of increased LBS from curved carbon fiber plates embedded within an AFT midsole on RE and spatiotemporal parameters.MethodsTwenty-one male trained runners completed 3 times 4 minutes at 13km/h with two experimental shoe models with a curved carbon fiber plate embedded in an AFT midsole with different LBS values (Stiff: 35.5 N/mm and Stiffest: 43.1 N/mm), and a Control condition (no carbon fiber plate: 20.1 N/mm). We measured energy cost of running (W/kg) and spatiotemporal parameters in one visit.ResultsRE improved for the Stiff shoe condition (15.71 ± 0.95 W/kg; p<0.001;n2=0.374) compared to the Control condition (16.13 ± 1.08 W/kg) and Stiffest condition (16.03 ± 1.19 W/kg). However, we found no significant differences between the Stiffest and Control conditions. Moreover, there were no spatiotemporal differences between shoe conditions.ConclusionChanges in LBS in AFT influences RE suggesting that moderately stiff shoes are the most effective LBS to improve RE in AFT compared to very stiff shoes and traditional, flexible shoe conditions while running at 13 km/h.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Relationship between advanced footwear technology longitudinal bending stiffness and energy cost of running

Rodrigo-Carranza,

Hoogkamer,

González-Ravé

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Control model was selected because it has the same drop and midsole height as the experimental conditions but does not have a carbon fiber plate to increase the LBS. Previous studies have shown that these characteristics can influence the RE [24, 25].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship Between Advanced Footwear Technology Longitudinal Bending Stiffness and Energy Cost of Running

Rodrigo‐Carranza,

Hoogkamer,

González‐Ravé

et al. 2024

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction/PurposeShoe longitudinal bending stiffness (LBS) is often considered to influence running economy (RE) and thus, running performance. However, previous results are mixed and LBS levels have not been studied in advanced footwear technology (AFT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of increased LBS from curved carbon fiber plates embedded within an AFT midsole compared to a traditional running shoe on RE and spatiotemporal parameters.MethodsTwenty‐one male trained runners completed three times 4 min at 13 km/h with two experimental shoe models with a curved carbon fiber plate embedded in an AFT midsole with different LBS values (Stiff: 35.5 N/mm and Stiffest: 43.1 N/mm), and a Control condition (no carbon fiber plate: 20.1 N/mm). We measured energy cost of running (W/kg) and spatiotemporal parameters in one visit.ResultsRE improved for the Stiff shoe condition (15.71 ± 0.95 W/kg; p < 0.001; n2 = 0.374) compared to the Control condition (16.13 ± 1.08 W/kg; 2.56%) and Stiffest condition (16.03 ± 1.19 W/kg; 1.98%). However, we found no significant differences between the Stiffest and Control conditions. Moreover, there were no spatiotemporal differences between shoe conditions.ConclusionChanges in LBS in AFT influences RE suggesting that moderately stiff shoes have the most effective LBS to improve RE in AFT compared to very stiff shoes and traditional, flexible shoe conditions while running at 13 km/h.

show abstract

Prediction of the effect of stack height on running biomechanics using optimal control simulation

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The traction requirements of female and male basketball players

Cited by 3 publications

References 17 publications

Relationship between advanced footwear technology longitudinal bending stiffness and energy cost of running

Relationship between advanced footwear technology longitudinal bending stiffness and energy cost of running

Relationship Between Advanced Footwear Technology Longitudinal Bending Stiffness and Energy Cost of Running

Prediction of the effect of stack height on running biomechanics using optimal control simulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About