2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2ra20684f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The toxic effect of silver ions and silver nanoparticles towards bacteria and human cells occurs in the same concentration range

Abstract: Silver is commonly used both in ionic form and in nanoparticulate form as a bactericidal agent. This is generally ascribed to a higher toxicity towards prokaryotic cells than towards mammalian cells. Comparative studies with both silver ions (such as silver acetate) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)stabilized silver nanoparticles (70 nm) showed that the toxic effect of silver occurs in a similar concentration range for Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), and peripheral b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
228
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(71 reference statements)
10
228
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Insoluble silver species, eg, silver sulfide, were not considered because their contribution to the toxicity is negligible (except for argyria). For ionic silver and nanosilver similar adverse effect levels have been reported in vitro [72][73][74][75] and in vivo. 50,76 Therefore, ionic silver and nanosilver organ levels can be compared to the same no observed effect level, which is indicated by the grey-shaded area in Figure 8.…”
Section: Exposure and Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Insoluble silver species, eg, silver sulfide, were not considered because their contribution to the toxicity is negligible (except for argyria). For ionic silver and nanosilver similar adverse effect levels have been reported in vitro [72][73][74][75] and in vivo. 50,76 Therefore, ionic silver and nanosilver organ levels can be compared to the same no observed effect level, which is indicated by the grey-shaded area in Figure 8.…”
Section: Exposure and Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…As discussed above, this approach was based on reports of similar adverse effects after exposure to the same amount of ionic silver or nanosilver. 50,73,75,76 However, the advantage of our PBPK models is that new evidence on the impact of, for example, size and surface composition on the toxic response of an organ can easily be incorporated submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com…”
Section: Exposure and Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise Greulich et al reported that the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of silver against Staphylococcus aureus is in the range 2.5-5 mg/L (depending on the inoculated cell number of bacteria). 28,29 Thus, the silver amount released by the three materials tested in this study is in the bactericidal range.…”
Section: Percutaneous Penetration Of Silvermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, it was expected that SNPs would be used in a broad range of applications. 12 Many studies regarding SNPs have been published, [13][14][15][16][17][18] although there has been little discussion on their application in oral implantology. 19 Most of the published works lack in comprehensive evaluation of the properties of the described materials, such as roughness, 15,17,20 wettability, 15,17,21,22 or biocompatibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%