1995
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.49.8.795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Touch Inventory for Elementary-School-Aged Children: Test–Retest Reliability and Mother–Child Correlations

Abstract: These results suggest that using information from both mothers and children might provide a more complete picture of tactile defensiveness, but further research is needed before using a mother's assessment when the TIE is implemented as a standard procedure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the unique challenges posed to persons with developmental disabilities may include difficulties communicating sensory needs and experiences to caregivers; thus, sensory-defensive experiences could be underreported by caregivers. Discrepancies between self and caregiver reports (Bennett & Peterson, 1995) and discrepancies between different formats (Baranek & Berkson, 1994) for assessment of tactile defensiveness have been described previously. No direct prevalence comparisons can be made to typical populations because such data are not available.…”
Section: Relative Prevalencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Perhaps the unique challenges posed to persons with developmental disabilities may include difficulties communicating sensory needs and experiences to caregivers; thus, sensory-defensive experiences could be underreported by caregivers. Discrepancies between self and caregiver reports (Bennett & Peterson, 1995) and discrepancies between different formats (Baranek & Berkson, 1994) for assessment of tactile defensiveness have been described previously. No direct prevalence comparisons can be made to typical populations because such data are not available.…”
Section: Relative Prevalencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Low parent-child agreement was also demonstrated in other similar studies (Rapee, Barrett, Dadds & Evans, 1994;Wachtel, Rodrigue, Geffken, GrahamPole & Turner, 1994). Bennet and Peterson (1995) who studied the agreement between non-tactile defensive children's scores on the TIE and their mothers' scores on a modified version of the TIE, also reported only slight or fair agreement between scores. In an effort to increase parent-child agreement, Nguyen et al (1994) used clinician's clinical judgements to improve parent-child (5-12 years old) agreement on depressed children's symptoms.…”
Section: Child-parent Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test-retest reliability for the TIE was found by Royeen (1987b) to be r = 0.588; p = 0.001. Recently, Bennet and Peterson (1995), who used a larger sample than Royeen and a shorter interval between tests, established highly significant test retest reliability for the TIE (r = 0.91; p <0.001).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were required to rate these situations on a 3-point scale in terms of the level of inconvenience: 'no', 'a little', 'a lot'. The TIE has a good internal reliability (a coefficient alpha of 0.79 and standardized alpha 0.79), 15 test-retest reliability (r=0.91, p<0.001), 21 and validity (discriminant analysis: p=0.007, 85% correct classification). 15 The English TIE was translated into Dutch for the current study using double translation procedures (i.e.…”
Section: Tactile Defensivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%