2016
DOI: 10.1134/s1063772916080060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The total number of spicules on the solar surface and their role in heating and mass balanace in the solar corona

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Super-sonic motions associated with spicules and some fibrils are notable by their absence. For a typical length of a spicule of 5-10 , and assuming that 10 5 such spicules are present at any time on the Sun (Mamedov et al 2016), we would expect to see one spicule cross a randomly oriented slit of this length at any time. The small-scale features at line-center observed almost everywhere are therefore not related to spicules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Super-sonic motions associated with spicules and some fibrils are notable by their absence. For a typical length of a spicule of 5-10 , and assuming that 10 5 such spicules are present at any time on the Sun (Mamedov et al 2016), we would expect to see one spicule cross a randomly oriented slit of this length at any time. The small-scale features at line-center observed almost everywhere are therefore not related to spicules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the area coverage of spicules inferred from data above the limb is too small to contribute signifi-cantly to the spatially-averaged profiles, (e.g. Judge & Carlsson 2010;Mamedov et al 2016). However, models do show that the k 2 and K 2 peaks form substantially lower in the atmosphere (Vernazza et al 1981;Leenaarts et al 2013;Bjørgen et al 2018).…”
Section: Observations and Their Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…De Pontieu et al (2009) derived an energy of 10 23 erg for Type II spicules, while Klimchuk (2012) derived 8 × 10 22 erg based on an emission measure distribution. Mamedov et al (2016) discussed several possibilities for energy input due to both classical and Type II spicules, which in some instances are an order of magnitude larger than the above values. In a recent work, Samanta et al (2019) performed an order-of-magnitude estimate of the kinetic energy of spicules (1.2 × 10 23 erg), and the maximum available magnetic energy (2.5 × 10 25 erg) at the foot-points of spicules based on Hα spectral scans and magnetic field data from the Goode Solar Telescope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…De Pontieu et al (2009) derived an energy of 10 23 erg for Type II spicules, while Klimchuk (2012) derived 8 × 10 22 erg based on an emission measure distribution. Mamedov et al (2016) discussed several possibilities for energy input due to both classical and Type II spicules, which in some instances are an order of magnitude larger than the above values. In a recent work, Samanta et al (2019) performed an order-of-magnitude estimate of the kinetic energy of spicules (1.2 × 10 23 erg), and the maximum available magnetic energy (2.5 × 10 25 erg) at the footpoints of spicules based on Hα spectral scans and magnetic field data from the Goode Solar Telescope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%