2005
DOI: 10.1108/00070700510586461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Toronto food inspection and disclosure system

Abstract: Purpose -To describe and then review the Toronto food inspection to describe that inspection system and to assess the mandated completion rates, compliance rates, impact of food-handler training and levels of standardization in inspection and enforcement activities. Design/methodology/approach -The study included a review and summary of information relating to compliance inspections as well as analysis of data stored in the Toronto Healthy Environments Information System using descriptive and inferential stati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These views are supported by several studies reporting that the standardized inspections in combination with published inspection results can improve the consistency and impact of the official food controls (Griffith, 2005;Hadjichristodoulou, Mouchtouri, Varzakas, Arvanitoyannis, & Kremastinou, 2008;Jones, Pavlin, LaFleur, Ingram, & Schaffner, 2004;Thompson, De Burger, & Kadri, 2005). The officials also considered the uniformity of the official food controls highly important, but did not consider the controls in Finland to be uniform.…”
Section: Factors With Direct Influence On Efficacymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These views are supported by several studies reporting that the standardized inspections in combination with published inspection results can improve the consistency and impact of the official food controls (Griffith, 2005;Hadjichristodoulou, Mouchtouri, Varzakas, Arvanitoyannis, & Kremastinou, 2008;Jones, Pavlin, LaFleur, Ingram, & Schaffner, 2004;Thompson, De Burger, & Kadri, 2005). The officials also considered the uniformity of the official food controls highly important, but did not consider the controls in Finland to be uniform.…”
Section: Factors With Direct Influence On Efficacymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Also there is a need for more regular inspection of food establishments by the local authorities in order to check the compliance with the food hygiene and food safety requirements at every stage of food preparation to prevent possible food contamination. Evidence from countries which used rating system such as USA, parts of Canada, Denmark, New Zealand and Singapore suggests that food hygiene schemes lead to improved standards of food safety, and better sales as well as being welcomed by customers (Boehnke & Graham, 2000;Moriss, 2005;Thompson, de Burger, & Kadri, 2005). Managers' opinion confirms their belief that a transparent FHR could lead to improved business.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus there would appear to be a clear linkage between effective formal training, improved catering practice and prevention or significant reduction of foodborne outbreaks in the catering industry (Coleman, Griffith, & Botterill, 2000). Training for caterers has been shown to improve food safety knowledge and hygiene awareness (Tebbutt, 1984;Worsfold, 1993), and may result in improved food safety practices (Gillespie, Little, & Mitchell, 2000;Thompson, de Burger, & Kadri, 2005), however, there is considerable evidence that improved knowledge does not always translate into improved food handling behaviour (Kassa, 2001;Riben, Mathias, Campbel, & Wiens, 1994;Taylor, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%