1989
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.20.9.1195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The TOPOSCOUT expert system for stroke localization.

Abstract: Clinically, strokes are localized by the findings on neurologic examination, TOPOSCOUT is an expert system designed to diagnose the anatomic location and the corresponding vascular territory of strokes based on the clinical signs and symptoms. The inference engine of TOPOSCOUT uses a backtracking algorithm and a rule-based data base that includes associations of neurologic signs with vascular and anatomic areas, TOPOSCOUT is capable of detecting typical stroke patterns, for example, "top-of-the-basilar" or Wal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agreement rates for the neurologic examination are higher for some findings than others, but vary even more than for history (21-92%). Another computerized system for the diagnosis and localization of stroke by vascular territory showed a high rate of agreement for patients with hemispheric lesions compared with data from the Hamburg Stroke Data Bank.21, 22 We believe that this study is the first to validate a questionnaire and algorithm against a n external panel of expert neurologists. Further, agreement rates may be improved by neurologists consulting one another before rendering an opinion1a or by additional training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Agreement rates for the neurologic examination are higher for some findings than others, but vary even more than for history (21-92%). Another computerized system for the diagnosis and localization of stroke by vascular territory showed a high rate of agreement for patients with hemispheric lesions compared with data from the Hamburg Stroke Data Bank.21, 22 We believe that this study is the first to validate a questionnaire and algorithm against a n external panel of expert neurologists. Further, agreement rates may be improved by neurologists consulting one another before rendering an opinion1a or by additional training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…hemisphere vs, brainstem) involved and have not attempted the degree of precision utilized here. Even so, the accuracy of these rule-based systems has been in the range of 50-75% (Reggia et al 1984, Spitzer et al 1989. While it is difficult to compare those efforts directly with the results obtained for the diagnostic problem-solving systems evaluated here, it is evident from the results of this study that abductive models of the type we examined can be very powerful, regardless of the plausibility criteria used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We set out to create a tool to assist in the localization of neurologic lesions that would overcome limitations of other neuroanatomical diagnostic programs. Most studies of computer-assisted neuroanatomical pattern recognition programs were designed in the 1980's and 1990's, and thus employ outdated computer technology [8][9][10] . More recently, Kamo et al 11 developed a sophisticated tool demonstrating that computer memory could be valuable in identifying causative lesions based on neuroanatomical pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%