2012
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2012-04990-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The topological Baumgartner-Hajnal theorem

Abstract: Two new topological partition relations are proved. These are ω 1 → (top α + 1) 2 k and R → (top α + 1) 2 k for all α < ω 1 and all k < ω. Here the prefix "top" means that the homogeneous set α + 1 is closed in the order topology. In particular, the latter relation says that if the pairs of real numbers are partitioned into a finite number of classes, there is a homogeneous (all pairs in the same class), well-ordered subset of arbitrarily large countable order type which is closed in the usual topology of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since every stationary subset of ω 1 contains topological copies of every α ∈ ω 1 [Fri74], this therefore shows that ω 1 → top (α, ω + 1) 2 for all countable α. In turn, this result was later extended by Schipperus using elementary submodel techniques to show that ω 1 → top (α) 2 k for all α ∈ ω 1 and all finite k [Sch12] (the topological Baumgartner-Hajnal theorem). Meanwhile, both ω 1 → (ω 1 , α) 2 for all α ∈ ω 1 [Tod83] and ω 1 → (ω 1 , ω + 2) 2 [Haj60] are consistent with ZFC, though the topological version of the former remains unchecked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since every stationary subset of ω 1 contains topological copies of every α ∈ ω 1 [Fri74], this therefore shows that ω 1 → top (α, ω + 1) 2 for all countable α. In turn, this result was later extended by Schipperus using elementary submodel techniques to show that ω 1 → top (α) 2 k for all α ∈ ω 1 and all finite k [Sch12] (the topological Baumgartner-Hajnal theorem). Meanwhile, both ω 1 → (ω 1 , α) 2 for all α ∈ ω 1 [Tod83] and ω 1 → (ω 1 , ω + 2) 2 [Haj60] are consistent with ZFC, though the topological version of the former remains unchecked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Erdős and Rado [ER56] showed that ω 1 → (ω 1 , ω + 1) 2 . Laver noted in [Lav75] (and a proof, using a pressing down argument, is described for example in [Sch12]) that one actually has ω 1 → (Stationary, top ω + 1) 2 , meaning that one can ensure either a 0-homogeneous stationary subset or a 1-homogeneous topological copy of ω + 1. Since every stationary subset of ω 1 contains topological copies of every α ∈ ω 1 [Fri74], this therefore shows that ω 1 → top (α, ω + 1) 2 for all countable α.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Topological Baumgartner-Hajnal Theorem, proved by Schipperus [3], provides a stronger result for the case k = 2, X = R. The latter states that if the pairs of real numbers are colored with c colors, there is a monochromatic, well-ordered subset of arbitrarily large countable order type which is closed in the usual topology of R. Applying the Topological Baumgartner-Hajnal Theorem to the special case where the order type is ω + 1, provides Theorem 2.1 of this note for k = 2, X = R. For k = 3 however, we show that the result in this note cannot be strengthened in some sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we are concerned with structural strengthenings of the usual rainbow Ramsey partition relations, loosely motivated by the study of topological partition relations, see [13] for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%