1996
DOI: 10.1097/00003226-199605000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Topcon SP 1000 and Image-NET Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be because of the fact that the Topcon SP-2000P and z-ring CS4 are both upgraded versions of the SP-1000P and CS3. Other studies using one endothelial image that was read on two occasions independently by two examiners reported that the SP-1000P results show poor test-retest reliability [34,38]. Also, poor agreement between SP-1000P and CS3 to determine ECD is thought to be due to poor image quality [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be because of the fact that the Topcon SP-2000P and z-ring CS4 are both upgraded versions of the SP-1000P and CS3. Other studies using one endothelial image that was read on two occasions independently by two examiners reported that the SP-1000P results show poor test-retest reliability [34,38]. Also, poor agreement between SP-1000P and CS3 to determine ECD is thought to be due to poor image quality [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%