The top 50 most cited articles on olecranon fractures: a bibliometric analysis

Marder, Ryan S.; Koehler, Steven M.; Aibinder, William R.

doi:10.1007/s00590-021-02928-y

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Time filter and other filters were not applied. Because the metrics of the articles according to the 50 most-cited papers was decreasing and similar studies used the first 50 most-cited articles in the analysis, we also selected the first 50 articles in the present research (Table 3, Table 4) [2][3][4]. All data obtained were recorded on the date of access.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Since the first bibliographic publication of Garfield in JAMA (1987), various journals on numerous topics have reported the "50 most-cited articles" both in general and specific journals [1][2][3][4]. Bibliographic analyses are the evaluation of publications produced by individuals or institutions in a specific area, in a particular period, and in a precise region.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of altmetrics and additional metrics of the 50 most-cited Behçet articles of all time: A Web of Science-based study

Evereklioğlu

Şener

Horozoğlu

2022

rjo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of altmetrics and additional metrics of the 50 most-cited Behçet articles of all time: A Web of Science-based study

Evereklioğlu

Şener

Horozoğlu

2022

rjo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Amir Human Hoveidaei, MD, MSc 1 Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, MD-MPH 2,3 Surena Namdari, MD, MSc 4 Seyed Hossein Hosseini-Asl 3,5 Mohammad Saeid Khonji, MD 6 Maryam Selk-Ghaffari, MD 1 Alireza Pouramini, MD 3 Dawn M. LaPorte, MD…”

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that the existing epidemiological data primarily originate from high-income countries [4][5][6] , limiting their direct applicability to the developing world. More specifically, there is a scarcity of research on fracture epidemiology in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region; the fracture burden in MENA is influenced by the region's diverse cultural, economic, and political status.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Increasing Burden of Upper-Extremity Fractures in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)

Hoveidaei,

Nakhostin-Ansari,

Namdari

et al. 2023

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Upper-extremity fractures (UEFs) account for a large proportion of bone fractures and are costly to both health and the economy. The fracture burden in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is influenced by the region’s diverse cultural, economic, and political status. This study examined UEF epidemiology and causes across the MENA region and within the 21 MENA countries as categorized by the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data set. Methods: On the basis of GBD data, this study evaluated the epidemiology of UEFs from 1990 to 2019. The causes of injuries, incidence, number of years of healthy life lost due to disability (YLD), and their association with the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) were obtained and calculated for males and females in all age groups. Results: From 1990 to 2019, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of UEFs in the MENA region increased by 2.33%, to 1,086.39 per 100,000 people, and the YLD rate increased 15.69%, to 9.17 per 100,000, opposing the global decreasing trends. Fractures of the radius and/or ulna had the highest ASIR (505.32 per 100,000) of all UEF types in 2019. The clavicle, scapula, and humerus had the highest increasing trend among the fracture sites. In 2019, Saudi Arabia had the highest ASIR of UEFs (2,296.93 per 100,000). Afghanistan had the highest age-standardized YLD rate due to UEFs (19.6 per 100,000) in 2019, with Syria (153.32%) and Iran (37.04%) experiencing the greatest increase and decrease, respectively, from 1990 to 2019. Falling was the leading cause of UEFs, accounting for 45.05% of incidence and 41.19% of YLD overall. Conclusions: Contrary to global trends, UEFs increased in the MENA region during the study period. Countries with higher fracture incidence and YLD should consider preventive and rehabilitation strategies.

show abstract

“…This bibliometric analysis will provide a quantitative and qualitative assessment of India's fracture research over the last three decades. Various scholars have utilized the bibliometric analysis methodology for assessing and evaluating the current status and trends of research in multiple types of fractures, including ankle (Zeng et al, 2022), calcaneus (Goedderz et al, 2022), distal radius (Grant and Chung, 2021;Jones et al, 2017), femoral neck (Peng et al, 2022), hips (Hu et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2021;Agar and Sahin, 2022), maxillofacial (Tekin and Bahsi, 2021), odontoid , olecranon (Marder et al, 2022), osteoporosis vertebral compression (Li et al, 2022), proximal humerus (Cantrell et al, 2019), Sacral (Huang et al, 2020), scaphoid (Irwin et al, 2020), spine fracture (Donally et al, 2019), and thoracolumbar fractures (Ankomah et al, 2018;Vazquez et al, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture research from India between 1989 to 2022: A scientometric study

Vaishya

Gupta²,

Kappi³

et al. 2023

Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. Research on fractures has increased rapidly in India in recent years, but no bibliometric study has been performed on this subject. From the Scopus database, we aimed to examine the bibliometric characteristics, trends, and current status of India’s fracture research and publications between 1989 and 2022. Design/Methodology/Approach. We identified the key organizations, authors, journals, and important keywords, besides studying and visualizing their collaborative interactions using VOSviewer and Biblioshyn software. Results/Discussion. The 1046 India fractures research publications were identified and cited 8927 times. External funding was received by 1.91%, and 11.95% had international collaboration. The 894 authors from 304 organizations and publishing in 88 journals were involved in India’s fracture research. The most productive organization was AIIMS, New Delhi. The most impactful organization was JIPMER, Pondicherry; the most productive author was V. Trikha. The most productive journal was the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (n=257), and the most impactful journal was Acta Orthopaedica. Femur was the top anatomical location studied for fracture research, followed by Humerus and Tibia. Hip fractures were the most emphasized fracture research areas in older people, in contrast to Humerus, and Femur fracture research in adolescents and children. Delhi was the epicentre of research. Conclusion. This study is the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of India’s fracture research over 30 years. It provided an insight into its current and past research status and hopes to guide scholars to understand research frontiers and directions in fracture-related research.

show abstract

The top 50 most cited articles on olecranon fractures: a bibliometric analysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 35 publications

Analysis of altmetrics and additional metrics of the 50 most-cited Behçet articles of all time: A Web of Science-based study

Analysis of altmetrics and additional metrics of the 50 most-cited Behçet articles of all time: A Web of Science-based study

Increasing Burden of Upper-Extremity Fractures in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)

Fracture research from India between 1989 to 2022: A scientometric study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About