The top 100 most-cited Orthopaedics &amp; Traumatology: Surgery &amp; Research articles

Érivan, Roger; Villatte, Guillaume; Ollivier, Matthieu; Reina, Nicolas; Descamps, Stéphane; Boisgard, Stéphane

doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.016

Cited by 19 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many medical specialists have utilized citation rank analysis to identify the most influential papers in their field, which include drug [16], disease [17,18], cancer [19], and surgery [20,21]. To date, no studies have been undertaken to determine the most influential papers in the field of ADHD.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting the number of article citations in the field of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with the 100 top-cited articles since 2014: a bibliometric analysis

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder in children or early adolescents with an estimated worldwide prevalence of 7.2%. Numerous articles related to ADHD have been published in the literature. However, which articles had ultimate influence is still unknown, and what factors affect the number of article citations remains unclear as well. This bibliometric analysis (1) visualizes the prominent entities with 1 picture using the top 100 most-cited articles, and (2) investigates whether medical subject headings (i.e., MeSH terms) can be used in predicting article citations. Methods By searching the PubMed Central® (PMC) database, the top 100 most-cited abstracts relevant to ADHD since 2014 were downloaded. Citation rank analysis was performed to compare the dominant roles of article types and topic categories using the pyramid plot. Social network analysis (SNA) was performed to highlight prominent entities for providing a quick look at the study result. The authors examined the MeSH prediction effect on article citations using its correlation coefficients (CC). Results The most frequent article types and topic categories were research support by institutes (56%) and epidemiology (28%). The most productive countries were the United States (42%), followed by the United Kingdom (13%), Germany (9%), and the Netherlands (9%). Most articles were published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (15%) and JAMA Psychiatry (9%). MeSH terms were evident in prediction power on the number of article citations (correlation coefficient = 0.39; t = 4.1; n = 94; 6 articles were excluded because they do not have MeSH terms). Conclusions The breakthrough was made by developing 1 dashboard to display 100 top-cited articles on ADHD. MeSH terms can be used in predicting article citations on ADHD. These visualizations of the top 100 most-cited articles could be applied to future academic pursuits and other academic disciplines.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Predicting the number of article citations in the field of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with the 100 top-cited articles since 2014: a bibliometric analysis

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 Some journals and conferences will only publish and present works in English. 3,9 In a recent study by Ramirez-Castañeda, the negative effects of using English as the single scientific language was analyzed in Colombia. 10 The study found that 43.5% of papers that are rejected or returned for revisions have to do with English grammatical mistakes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While this may suggest an increased reach of orthopaedic articles in general, in 2009, the Orthopedic and Traumatology: Surgery and Research (OTSR) journal was created in an attempt to broaden the reach of the French journal Revue de Chirugie Orthopédique et Traumatologique (RCO). 9 The use of this new journal has allowed French speaking surgeons to obtain visibility to their previously hidden work.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends in Pediatric Orthopaedic Publications by Language

Pascual-Leone¹,

Chipman²,

Gross³

et al. 2022

Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: English publications have been found to be more widely cited than publications in other languages leading to a higher impact in various fields. Many authors have thus focused on publishing in English so as to reach the largest audience possible, however, important non-English publications remain a vital part of the peer-reviewed literature. This study sought to understand the relative quantities of pediatric orthopaedic publications written in the top 10 languages published in PubMed. Methods: The 10 languages with the most publications in PubMed were analyzed. These included English, German, Chinese, French, Russian, Japanese, Spanish, Polish, Italian, and Portuguese. All publications in orthopaedics and pediatric orthopaedics were pulled for each language. Publication rates were analyzed by individual language and by English versus non-English. Results: A total of 522,099 publications were analyzed between 1960-2020. English publications accounted for 93.1% of all orthopaedic publications and 91.4% of pediatric orthopaedic publications. When analyzing by individual language, German, French, and Chinese accounted for the greatest number of non-English publications with 24.9%, 21.2%, and 20.0% of non-English pediatric orthopaedic publications, respectively. Conclusion: In the 10 languages analyzed in this study, 8.6% of pediatric orthopaedic publications were written in non-English languages. When performing systematic reviews, care should be taken to assess literature published in these languages, specifically German, French, and Chinese, as they account for the greatest number of non-English publications. This will ensure that no relevant constituent studies are missed in qualitative syntheses due to lack of translation or access.

show abstract

“…Impact describes the effect that research has on the scientific community and the role published findings play in advancing the field. The number of citations an article receives after its publication is the most frequently used proxy for impact [13,14,32,33]. Citation count is another consideration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Large Database Studies on Orthopedic Surgery Literature: Are We Advancing the Field?

Tornberg

Cohen

Gu³

et al. 2022

HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Speci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: While database studies have become more prevalent in the literature, there is concern over their value. In addition, the questions they are suitable to answer are limited. Questions/Purposes: We sought to determine the incidence of database studies in the orthopedic literature and in each subspecialty. In addition, we wanted to assess the impact of database studies on the literature by determining whether citations and Altmetric Attention Scores (AAS) varied by study type (studies using internal or external databases and those not using databases). Methods: We searched PubMed for articles published in impactful orthopedic surgery journals in the year 2018. All articles were discoverable on the Altmetric explorer portal database. Impact was determined by journal impact factor. Study design, subspecialty, number of citations, and AAS were obtained. Univariable analyses were conducted between study type, demographic variables, and the outcome of either citation count or AAS. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of the primary outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed to differentiate the impact of external and internal database studies compared with non-database studies. Results: A total of 2684 total articles were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 366 studies (13.6%) were database studies. Hip and knee articles had the greatest incidence of database studies. Database studies had significantly more citations (5.9 vs 4.0) and significantly higher AAS (12.8 vs 11.3) compared with non-database studies. External database studies had significantly more citations (6.7 vs 4.8) and significantly higher AAS (14.0 vs 10.7) than internal database studies. Internal database studies had higher traditional citation counts but similar AAS to non-database studies. Conclusions: In 2018, database studies in well-reputed orthopedic journals had a greater number of citations but similar AAS compared with non-database studies. Further studies are warranted.

show abstract

The top 100 most-cited Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research articles

Cited by 19 publications

References 26 publications

Predicting the number of article citations in the field of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with the 100 top-cited articles since 2014: a bibliometric analysis

Predicting the number of article citations in the field of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with the 100 top-cited articles since 2014: a bibliometric analysis

Trends in Pediatric Orthopaedic Publications by Language

Impact of Large Database Studies on Orthopedic Surgery Literature: Are We Advancing the Field?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About