1996
DOI: 10.1136/tc.5.4.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tobacco industry's code of advertising in the United States: myth and reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of cigarette advertising since the inception of the tobacco industry's voluntary 1964 cigarette-advertising code and in succeeding years since its 1990 revision indicate that major provisions of the code have been routinely violated. 59,60 The MSA also does not apply to payments for product placement by the non-US subsidiaries of the multinational tobacco companies, as was done when Philip Morris Europe (based in Switzerland) made an agreement with Pinewood Studios (in England) to place Marlboros in Superman II 1,61 or when Philip Morris' advertising agency (in Japan) worked through a Swiss intermediary to pay the Londonbased producers of the James Bond movie License to Kill $350 000 to feature Lark cigarettes as part of its effort to open up the Japanese market. 1,62,63 Both of these transactions could be executed today without violating the MSA.…”
Section: The Master Settlement Agreement (Msa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of cigarette advertising since the inception of the tobacco industry's voluntary 1964 cigarette-advertising code and in succeeding years since its 1990 revision indicate that major provisions of the code have been routinely violated. 59,60 The MSA also does not apply to payments for product placement by the non-US subsidiaries of the multinational tobacco companies, as was done when Philip Morris Europe (based in Switzerland) made an agreement with Pinewood Studios (in England) to place Marlboros in Superman II 1,61 or when Philip Morris' advertising agency (in Japan) worked through a Swiss intermediary to pay the Londonbased producers of the James Bond movie License to Kill $350 000 to feature Lark cigarettes as part of its effort to open up the Japanese market. 1,62,63 Both of these transactions could be executed today without violating the MSA.…”
Section: The Master Settlement Agreement (Msa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the industry's emphasis on physical activity messages could be helpful, the effects may be negative if the companies associate health messages with unhealthy products. In fact, the tobacco industry was criticized for using sports to promote its products, including product placement in child-targeted sports video games (21,22) as well as sports sponsorships and athlete endorsements (23) . There is little documentation of the extent and impact of physical activity and sports being used to market food.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…106 The tobacco industry anticipated the ban on television advertising in Japan well in advance of its enactment, and worked to delay its implementation using the same strategies it successfully deployed in other parts of the world: hiring local experts and other third parties to speak on behalf of the industry questioning the relationship between advertising and youth smoking, and adopting incremental voluntary restrictions without outside enforcement as an alternative to stronger legislation. [70][71][72][73] Moreover, the 1998 voluntary agreement that ended television advertising in Japan also preserved many of the alternative promotional activities the industry expanded during the prior decade. 88 The voluntary code also lacks outside enforcement 107 ; the tobacco industry has a history of violating its self regulatory codes in other parts of the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%