2016
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1201862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The timing of surgical treatment of traumatic facial paralysis: a systematic review

Abstract: Six studies including 119 patients (119 cases) fulfilled the study requirements. The number of patients who achieved perfect recovery of House-Brackmanm (H-B) grade 1 was 40 of 119 patients (33.6%). Good results were demonstrated in 94.4% (17/18) of patients managed with surgical decompression within 2 weeks vs 63.4% (64/101) of patients undergoing surgical intervention at >2 weeks (p = 0.009).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TBF was found in 13 ears in this research, 4 ears were accompanied with FN injury, the perigeniculate area and tympanic segment was most commonly involved in the injury, which was in according with previous researches [4,11]. Though the timing of treatment of traumatic FN paralysis was under controversy [23], the case of traumatic FN paralysis combined with TOD was a good indicator for timely surgery, especially for the cases with severe immediate-onset facial paralysis and lack of response to the corticosteroid therapy. A few approaches can be used for FN decompression depending on the injury sites, including transmastoid approach and the middle cranial fossa approach, however, it is a challenging to control these areas through traditional surgical approaches [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…TBF was found in 13 ears in this research, 4 ears were accompanied with FN injury, the perigeniculate area and tympanic segment was most commonly involved in the injury, which was in according with previous researches [4,11]. Though the timing of treatment of traumatic FN paralysis was under controversy [23], the case of traumatic FN paralysis combined with TOD was a good indicator for timely surgery, especially for the cases with severe immediate-onset facial paralysis and lack of response to the corticosteroid therapy. A few approaches can be used for FN decompression depending on the injury sites, including transmastoid approach and the middle cranial fossa approach, however, it is a challenging to control these areas through traditional surgical approaches [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“… 28 For traumatic facial palsy, surgical decompression within two weeks of onset had good results, and surgical exploration within two months lead to acceptable outcomes. 29 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a comparative study between VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation for facial nerve reanimation, XII-to-VII showed a higher probability of functional restoration, but also had higher complication rates and required second-stage surgery. 29 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperatively 12% (6) patients were in grade II, 12% (6) in grade III, 48% (24) in grade IV, 28% (14) in grade V. At the end of study that is 12 months 88% (44) patients had successful outcome with surgery however 12% (6) did not due to late presentation leading to complete laceration of the nerve in comparison to a study done by Luan et al 60 patients who were surgically treated, 39 achieved grade I of facial nerve function, 18 achieved grade II, two achieved grade III, and one achieved grade IV according to the HB grading system, thus 65% (39) of the patients achieved grade I facial nerve function. 9 On the basis of the outcome observed in the present surgical series, the recovery of satisfactory facial nerve function could be achieved, regardless of timing of surgery performed, within the first 3 months after the onset of paralysis which was similar to a study done by Darrouzet et al 10 This study demonstrates that unless there is a disruption of the main trunk, necessitating primary end to end anastomosis or grafting, the type of injury does not have any clear effect on the facial outcome, as long as appropriate surgical management is applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%