2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The timing of surgery for cholecystitis: a review of 202 consecutive patients at a large municipal hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the RCT by Gutt et al [19], the group of patients (n=314) operated on at days 7 to 45 after hospital admission had no difference in conversion rates when compared to patients undergoing cholecystectomy within 24 h. However, it needs to be emphasised that this trial was performed in a tertiary unit where the surgeons would have the experience and expertise to operate on difficult cases. However, in a retrospective review [36] of 202 patients, there were no differences in conversion rate or complication rates in patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 4 days and 5 weeks of onset of symptoms, as compared to those who underwent surgery within 72 h or beyond 5 weeks. In other retrospective reviews, patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 3 and 10 days [46], 4 and 21 days [47], 4 and 8 days [48] and 4 days and 6 weeks [41] after onset of symptoms or hospital admission did not have increased morbidity, mortality or conversion rate when compared to patients who underwent surgery within 72 h. Another retrospective review [49] found that the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy increased from 10 % in patients operated on within 2 days of onset of symptoms to 16 % in those operated on 3-4 days to 39 % for those operated on 5 days or more after onset of symptoms.…”
Section: Management Of Patients With Delayed Presentation Of Acute Chmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the RCT by Gutt et al [19], the group of patients (n=314) operated on at days 7 to 45 after hospital admission had no difference in conversion rates when compared to patients undergoing cholecystectomy within 24 h. However, it needs to be emphasised that this trial was performed in a tertiary unit where the surgeons would have the experience and expertise to operate on difficult cases. However, in a retrospective review [36] of 202 patients, there were no differences in conversion rate or complication rates in patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 4 days and 5 weeks of onset of symptoms, as compared to those who underwent surgery within 72 h or beyond 5 weeks. In other retrospective reviews, patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 3 and 10 days [46], 4 and 21 days [47], 4 and 8 days [48] and 4 days and 6 weeks [41] after onset of symptoms or hospital admission did not have increased morbidity, mortality or conversion rate when compared to patients who underwent surgery within 72 h. Another retrospective review [49] found that the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy increased from 10 % in patients operated on within 2 days of onset of symptoms to 16 % in those operated on 3-4 days to 39 % for those operated on 5 days or more after onset of symptoms.…”
Section: Management Of Patients With Delayed Presentation Of Acute Chmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Proponents also claim that an early cholecystectomy may reduce hospital stay and prevent readmissions to hospital. Surgical teaching has been that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be undertaken successfully within 72 h of onset of symptoms and, beyond this period, operative difficulty increases [36]. However, there is no consensus on the optimal timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy.…”
Section: Surgical Management Of Acute Cholecystitismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, in a meta-analysis recognizing the superiority of early surgery, the time limit is variable from 48 h to seven days [12] and recent evidence has not shown clinical advantage with this strict temporal limit. [24][25][26] One question rises looking at the gap between clinical and economic advantages of index cholecystectomy for AAC and the "reluctance" to apply ELC: why? One reason could be still related to the surgeon fair for an anecdotal belief of higher common bile duct injury and higher conversion rate in the acute setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%