2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2433962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Timeliness of UK Private Company Financial Reporting: Regulatory and Economic Influences

Abstract: This paper investigates the extent to which the timeliness of UK private companies' accounting information reflects regulatory and economic influences by studying the impact of a one month shortening of the statutory regulatory filing deadline. Using the financial reporting lag and propensity to file late as measures of timeliness, we find that although reporting behaviour is largely driven by regulatory deadlines, companies conjectured to be producing accounting information for reporting to outside investors … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the UK, USA and Australia) suggest that financial reporting timeliness is also a priority for regulators. Keeping in view the importance of the timely audited reports, in jurisdictions such as the UK, USA and Australia, there is a mandatory time period requirement for firms to provide audited financial statements to their shareholders and other key stakeholders (Behn, Sercy, & Woodroof, 2006;Doyle & Magilke, 2013;Schmidt & Wilkins, 2013;Sultana et al, 2015;Clatworthy and Peel, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the UK, USA and Australia) suggest that financial reporting timeliness is also a priority for regulators. Keeping in view the importance of the timely audited reports, in jurisdictions such as the UK, USA and Australia, there is a mandatory time period requirement for firms to provide audited financial statements to their shareholders and other key stakeholders (Behn, Sercy, & Woodroof, 2006;Doyle & Magilke, 2013;Schmidt & Wilkins, 2013;Sultana et al, 2015;Clatworthy and Peel, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%