2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2017.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Time Is Up: Compression of Visual Time Interval Estimations of Bimodal Aperiodic Patterns

Abstract: The ability to estimate time intervals subserves many of our behaviors and perceptual experiences. However, it is not clear how aperiodic (AP) stimuli affect our perception of time intervals across sensory modalities. To address this question, we evaluated the human capacity to discriminate between two acoustic (A), visual (V) or audiovisual (AV) time intervals of trains of scattered pulses. We first measured the periodicity of those stimuli and then sought for correlations with the accuracy and reaction times… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where T% corresponds to T proportion in a morph, "µ, " is the point of subjective equality (PSE, or the morphing value at 50% chance of perceiving a T), and "σ" (STD) or just noticeable difference (JND, or the proportion to differentiate NT from T 84% of the times; σ = 1; Duarte and Lemus, 2017;Duarte et al, 2018). For all PF, Q > 0.05, Q = (0.5•χ2, 0.5•v); where = upper incomplete gamma function, χ2 = chi-square, and v = degrees of freedom (Press et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where T% corresponds to T proportion in a morph, "µ, " is the point of subjective equality (PSE, or the morphing value at 50% chance of perceiving a T), and "σ" (STD) or just noticeable difference (JND, or the proportion to differentiate NT from T 84% of the times; σ = 1; Duarte and Lemus, 2017;Duarte et al, 2018). For all PF, Q > 0.05, Q = (0.5•χ2, 0.5•v); where = upper incomplete gamma function, χ2 = chi-square, and v = degrees of freedom (Press et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%