2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The time course of novelty processing in sensation seeking: An ERP study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the current study, a positive correlation between sensation seeking and P3 amplitude has been reported in a novelty detection paradigm (Zheng et al, 2010). We extend previous findings by revealing that the effect of sensation seeking interacts with disinhibition, which should not be surprising regarding the shared biological connections of the two dimensions (McDaniel & Mahan, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with the current study, a positive correlation between sensation seeking and P3 amplitude has been reported in a novelty detection paradigm (Zheng et al, 2010). We extend previous findings by revealing that the effect of sensation seeking interacts with disinhibition, which should not be surprising regarding the shared biological connections of the two dimensions (McDaniel & Mahan, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Heightened P3 amplitudes indicate stronger motivational impact of an outcome (Polezzi, Sartori, Rumiati, Vidotto, & Daum, 2010). Consistent with this interpretation, the P3 amplitude increased in individuals who attributed more meaning to outcomes (De Bruijn, Mars, & Hulstijn, 2004) or showed stronger desire for rewards (Zheng et al, 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Likewise, during a risky decision‐making task, whereas HSSs are less sensitive to punishments and tend to exhibit more risky behaviors after prior punishments, LSSs are more sensitive in evaluating different punishment intensities in brain areas including the left superior frontal gyrus, right nucleus accumbens, and left precuneus (Kruschwitz et al., ). Moreover, the attenuated ERN in high versus low sensation seekers is consistent with our previous findings that HSSs compared with LSSs exhibit a decreased N2 component to novel stimuli (Zheng et al., ), as well as emotional pictures (Zheng et al., ). Overall, these findings are consistent with the view that HSSs might possess a weaker avoidance‐withdrawal system than do LSSs (Depue & Collins, ; Lang, Shin, & Lee, ), whereby individuals with high sensation seeking present a vigilant response to a lesser extent in the face of the commission of an error.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Interestingly, low compared to high sensation seekers exhibited increased N2 activation to novel stimuli at frontal sites in an ERP study reported by Zheng et al (2010). Also, Pd3 (subtraction wave reflecting novelty processing) responses were enhanced and less habituated in high sensation seekers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%