1995
DOI: 10.1017/s1356186300006659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tibetan Inscription Attributed to Ye-shes-'od: a Note

Abstract: With reference to the interesting article by Laxman S. Thakur in JRAS, vol. 4, part 3 (1994) entitled “A Tibetan inscription by lHa Bla-ma Ye-shes-'od from dKor (sPu) rediscovered”, I think the inscription cannot be attributed to Ye-shes-'od but rather to one of his descendants, the bstan-po lha-sras mentioned in 1. 5 whose name has unfortunately been effaced.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Richardson suggests a date of 1076; Vitali offers no specific date; Petech opts for 1024. However, a study of the 20 Yarlung dynasty inscriptions published by Richardson reveals only two (the Lhasa Zhol Doring South (c.764 CE) and the tomb of Khri lde srong brtsan (815) whose preambles could be said to refer to previous rulers.…”
Section: Dkor Stelementioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Richardson suggests a date of 1076; Vitali offers no specific date; Petech opts for 1024. However, a study of the 20 Yarlung dynasty inscriptions published by Richardson reveals only two (the Lhasa Zhol Doring South (c.764 CE) and the tomb of Khri lde srong brtsan (815) whose preambles could be said to refer to previous rulers.…”
Section: Dkor Stelementioning
confidence: 99%