2002
DOI: 10.1177/016555150202800106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The three worlds of health information

Abstract: The applicability, validity and usefulness of Karl Popper's 'Three Worlds' epistemology is examined, with specific reference to health-care information and knowledge. It is concluded that Popper's ideas provide a valuable way of understanding this domain and that, in particular, Popper's controversial 'World 3' of objective knowledge is a valid concept. 50 1 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numbers measure attributes of people and groups, cognition and networks, collections and activities; all three of Popper's Worlds, for those who like that ontology as a basic for the subject (Bawden and Robinson, 2012B;Bawden, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numbers measure attributes of people and groups, cognition and networks, collections and activities; all three of Popper's Worlds, for those who like that ontology as a basic for the subject (Bawden and Robinson, 2012B;Bawden, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its impact has been limited: although it has been popular as a pedagogical model in LIS, and some writers have made more detailed use of it in an LIS context -see, for example, Bawden (2002), Abbott (2004), and Spink and Cole (2004) -it has not generated much in the way of either detailed conceptual insight or practical guidance, being silent on crucial issues such as information ethics and information quality (Bawden and Robinson 2016). It is interesting to note that Floridi (2002A, 2002B) regards Popper's conception of a third world as an example of the evolution of PI prior to the digital revolution, and that he himself was influenced by Popper ideas of knowledge (Warburton 2015).…”
Section: Alternatives To Pi "[Lis] Researchers" Wrotementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that Neill was correct, for Brookes' views have been widely cited and generally supported (see, for example, Neill [31], Abbott [32,33], Bawden [34], Spink and Cole [35], Ingwersen and Järvelin [27], and Zins [11]), though some have dissented (see, for example, Rudd [36] and Capurro [37]), and some have used the concepts of information spaces and Popper's worlds without reference to Brookes (see, for example, Boisot [38]).…”
Section: Foundations Of the Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%