Abstract:A very useful clinical vernier acuity or vernier alignment test has been developed in this and associated laboratories over a span of two decades. We seek to refine further this test, to seek internal inconsistencies and to optimize parameters used in a variety of devices and environments. Vernier testing, and many aspects of this work have been considered by numerous able scientists over a long time period (not reviewed here), but none have encountered conditions faced by this group, particularly in the devel… Show more
“…Hyperacuity refers to the visual system’s ability to perform spatial tasks beyond the eye’s classical resolution limit with thresholds as low as 3 to 6 s of arc [ 25 , 26 ]. Vernier alignment (vernier acuity), a classic hyperacuity task where participants discriminate difference in the relative spatial localisation of two or more visual stimuli such as lines or dots has been used in previous studies [ 27 – 29 ]. The use of such methods for conditions such as amblyopia [ 30 ] and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [ 31 ] have demonstrated perceptual distortions exhibit a similar dissociation from visual acuity as clinical keratoconus indices.…”
Background
Keratoconus is associated with thinning and anterior protrusion of the cornea resulting in the symptoms of blurry and distorted vision. The commonly used clinical vision tests such as visual acuity and contrast sensitivity may not reflect the symptoms experienced in keratoconus and there are no quantitative tools to measure visual distortion. In this study, we used a quantitative test based on vernier alignment and field matching techniques to quantify visual distortion in keratoconus and assess its relation to corneal structural changes.
Methods
A total of 50 participants (25 keratoconus and 25 visually normal) completed the experiment where they aligned supra-threshold white target circles in opposite field in reference to guidelines and circles to complete a square structure monocularly. The task was repeated five times and the global distortion index (GDI) and global uncertainty index (GUI) were calculated as the mean and standard deviation respectively of local perceived misalignment of target circles over five trials.
Results
Both GDI and GUI were higher in participants with keratoconus compared to controls (
p
< 0.01). Both parameters correlated with the best corrected visual acuity, maximum corneal curvature (K
max
), topographical keratoconus classification (TKC) and central corneal thickness (CCT).
Conclusion
Our findings show that the quantitative measure of distortion could be a useful tool for behavioural assessment of progressive keratoconus.
“…Hyperacuity refers to the visual system’s ability to perform spatial tasks beyond the eye’s classical resolution limit with thresholds as low as 3 to 6 s of arc [ 25 , 26 ]. Vernier alignment (vernier acuity), a classic hyperacuity task where participants discriminate difference in the relative spatial localisation of two or more visual stimuli such as lines or dots has been used in previous studies [ 27 – 29 ]. The use of such methods for conditions such as amblyopia [ 30 ] and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [ 31 ] have demonstrated perceptual distortions exhibit a similar dissociation from visual acuity as clinical keratoconus indices.…”
Background
Keratoconus is associated with thinning and anterior protrusion of the cornea resulting in the symptoms of blurry and distorted vision. The commonly used clinical vision tests such as visual acuity and contrast sensitivity may not reflect the symptoms experienced in keratoconus and there are no quantitative tools to measure visual distortion. In this study, we used a quantitative test based on vernier alignment and field matching techniques to quantify visual distortion in keratoconus and assess its relation to corneal structural changes.
Methods
A total of 50 participants (25 keratoconus and 25 visually normal) completed the experiment where they aligned supra-threshold white target circles in opposite field in reference to guidelines and circles to complete a square structure monocularly. The task was repeated five times and the global distortion index (GDI) and global uncertainty index (GUI) were calculated as the mean and standard deviation respectively of local perceived misalignment of target circles over five trials.
Results
Both GDI and GUI were higher in participants with keratoconus compared to controls (
p
< 0.01). Both parameters correlated with the best corrected visual acuity, maximum corneal curvature (K
max
), topographical keratoconus classification (TKC) and central corneal thickness (CCT).
Conclusion
Our findings show that the quantitative measure of distortion could be a useful tool for behavioural assessment of progressive keratoconus.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.