1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)94146-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The three-dimensional Structure of Bovine Platelet Factor 4 at 3.0-A Resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separation of PF4 from its proteoglycan counterpart gave rise to a protein that could be readily dis-solved at an acidic pH but remained insoluble under physiological conditions (27). All subsequent structural work with PF4 (e.g., x-ray crystallography studies) was carried out either under mildly acidic conditions or at an ionic strength that significantly exceeded the physiologically relevant levels (7,8). Elevation of the ionic strength of the PF4 solution gave rise to a progressively increasing ionic signal for the tetrameric form of this protein, although even at the highest ionic strength examined in these measurements (1.5 M), a prominent signal of the monomeric form of PF4 was still detected (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Separation of PF4 from its proteoglycan counterpart gave rise to a protein that could be readily dis-solved at an acidic pH but remained insoluble under physiological conditions (27). All subsequent structural work with PF4 (e.g., x-ray crystallography studies) was carried out either under mildly acidic conditions or at an ionic strength that significantly exceeded the physiologically relevant levels (7,8). Elevation of the ionic strength of the PF4 solution gave rise to a progressively increasing ionic signal for the tetrameric form of this protein, although even at the highest ionic strength examined in these measurements (1.5 M), a prominent signal of the monomeric form of PF4 was still detected (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite PF4-heparin association being an important aspect in the etiology of HIT, relatively little is known about the specific molecular mechanism of this interaction. Even before the crystal structures of PF4 (showing the continuous ring of positive potential encircling the PF4 tetramer (7,8)) became available, suggestions were made that the heparin chain wraps around the tetramer to maximize electrostatic contacts (mostly with the lysine-rich C-termini of the constituent polypeptide chains) (9), a conjecture that was mostly confirmed by modeling the interaction using the coordinates of PF4 tetrameric structure (10). Later NMR studies expanded the repertoire of heparin-binding sites within PF4 to include several arginine, lysine, and histidine residues located outside of the C-terminal helix (11) and provided evidence that heparin may play an important role in fine-tuning the protein conformation and indeed control both PF4 folding and assembly of its quaternary structure (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recently reported that introduction of three carboxy-terminal mutations into MIP-la rendered it monomeric at concentrations where wild-type MIPla is highly self-associated, yet there was no change in biological activity (Graham et al, 1994). Furthermore, the monomer conformation of self-associated forms of chemokines appears to be conserved for IL-8, PF4, and MIP-1 ß (Baldwin et al, 1991;Charles et al, 1989;Clore et al, 1990;Lodi et al, 1994), despite differences in the way that IL-8 and PF4 associate compared to MIP-ljS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IL-8 is secreted predominantly as an 8-kDa, 72 amino acid species with two internal disulfide bridges (Baggiolini & Clark-Lewis, 1992;Oppenheim et al, 1991). NMR and X-ray crystallography show that IL-8 is a homodimer (Baldwin et al, 1991;Clore et al, 1990) and reveal a structure related to platelet factor-4, another member of the chemokine family, which is tetrameric (Charles et al, 1989). Other members of the chemokine family, such as MIP-ljS (Lodi et al, 1994), are also structurally similar and tend to self-associate (Graham et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the complex interplay between chemokines and their receptors on a structural basis, several three-dimensional chemokine structures have been determined by either NMR spectroscopy or X-ray crystallography: PF-4 ( , ), IL-8 ( , ), MGSA ( ), Chi1 (), CINC/Gro ( , ), NAP-2 (), MIP-2 (), SDF-1α (), MIP-1β (), RANTES ( , ), MCP-1 ( , ), MCP-3 ( , ), and Eotaxin (). In all cases, the monomeric subunit exhibits a quite similar secondary and tertiary structure consisting of a triple-stranded antiparallel β-sheet packed against a carboxy-terminal α-helix, while the quaternary contacts of these proteins vary strongly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%