2014 Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 2014
DOI: 10.1109/rams.2014.6798478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The thirty greatest reliability challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5, we further experimented with different regularization rates to adjust the goodness of fit of the RNNs, which is based on the parameter λ in (3). We got the evaluation result 95.466% for jEdit 4.3 with η � 0.05, λ � 0.02, which is very close to the calculation result of Huang's model (96.224%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 5, we further experimented with different regularization rates to adjust the goodness of fit of the RNNs, which is based on the parameter λ in (3). We got the evaluation result 95.466% for jEdit 4.3 with η � 0.05, λ � 0.02, which is very close to the calculation result of Huang's model (96.224%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…(i) For a certain version, if a class has bug commit, it is defined as DPC (1) v4.0 x (2) v4.1 x (3) v4.2 x (4) v4.3 (ii) If a metric data of a class is obviously abnormal, the class is defined as DPC under the category including the metric as listed in Table 3 We assume that the historical version is aware of bug reports when we set jEdit 4.3 and Ant 1.7 as the current versions to be evaluated. is means that the classes in the current version are under development and there are no bug reports yet.…”
Section: Aggregation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation