2015
DOI: 10.1179/2055033215y.0000000008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The thermo-mechanical response of PP nanocomposites at high graphene loading

Abstract: an initial decrease, remained constant for loadings up to 50 wt-%. Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) showed a large decrease in the amount of lamellar structure relative to the neat PP, while wide angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) showed a high degree of crystallinity. These results are consistent with formation of a new type of layered nanocomposite, composed of crystalline PP chains oriented onto layered GNPs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 displays the comparison of the mechanical performance and flame retardation of the PP/PP-g-MA/ APZS composites with various PP nanocomposites reported in the literature. [3,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67] It can be inferred that the present study exhibited superior mechanical performance and flame retardation as compared to the reported values, especially in the absence of the IFR compounds. However, it should be noted that the properties of each nanocomposite can differ from others due to several factors, including processing conditions, types of fillers, interfacial interaction, filler morphology, testing parameters, IFR compounds, and so forth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Table 4 displays the comparison of the mechanical performance and flame retardation of the PP/PP-g-MA/ APZS composites with various PP nanocomposites reported in the literature. [3,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67] It can be inferred that the present study exhibited superior mechanical performance and flame retardation as compared to the reported values, especially in the absence of the IFR compounds. However, it should be noted that the properties of each nanocomposite can differ from others due to several factors, including processing conditions, types of fillers, interfacial interaction, filler morphology, testing parameters, IFR compounds, and so forth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In addition to its compatibilizing effect and char promotion effect, the high thermal conductivity of graphene has drawn a great attention as well. Kai et al melt blended graphene with polypropylene (PP) [54]. PP blends with carbon black and Cu microparticles, which also have high thermal conductivity, were also prepared.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of nanofillers such as layered silicates or organoclays, cellulose nanocrystals, carbon nanotubes (CNT) or graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) have all been explored to boost the performance of oriented polymer fibres or films. Property improvements included not only functional properties such as electrical or thermal conductivities when using nanocarbons like CNTs or graphene [11][12][13] but also focused on mechanical performance enhancements [5,14,15]. However, the question remains in many of these studies if the improvements in mechanical performance came from true nanofiller reinforcement or from some kind of modification of the polymer matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%