2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0269889706001141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Theory of the Cell State and the Question of Cell Autonomy in Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century Biology

Abstract: ArgumentA central thesis of the cell theory of biological organization is that plant and animal cells are, to some degree, autonomous vital units. Just how much autonomy cells possess was a matter of serious debate in the decades surrounding the turn of the twentieth century. The idea of cell autonomy was most strikingly expressed in the “theory of the cell state,” an idea based upon the metaphorical conception of higher plants and animals as social colonies of cells or elementary organisms, commonly associate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads us to one last but crucial direction in late nineteenthcentury part-whole relations of the biological individual: cell theory and its transcendence by a ''cell state,'' a socially-derived metaphor prominent from Virchow to Haeckel and beyond (see e.g., Richards, 2002, p. 260;Weindling, 1981;Mazzolini, 1988;Jacobs, 1989;Reynolds, 2007Reynolds, , 2008. Broadly, this was a conception of the multicellular organism as a state (aggregate, assemblage, colony, or commonwealth were also referents) in which single-celled individuals were mutually dependent and (for Haeckel) co-operated in a hierarchy of sorts where physiological division of labor served the whole.…”
Section: The Discussion After 1851mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads us to one last but crucial direction in late nineteenthcentury part-whole relations of the biological individual: cell theory and its transcendence by a ''cell state,'' a socially-derived metaphor prominent from Virchow to Haeckel and beyond (see e.g., Richards, 2002, p. 260;Weindling, 1981;Mazzolini, 1988;Jacobs, 1989;Reynolds, 2007Reynolds, , 2008. Broadly, this was a conception of the multicellular organism as a state (aggregate, assemblage, colony, or commonwealth were also referents) in which single-celled individuals were mutually dependent and (for Haeckel) co-operated in a hierarchy of sorts where physiological division of labor served the whole.…”
Section: The Discussion After 1851mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to his dogma is the idea of cell autonomy. Virchow's vision of the cells of an organism was comparable with citizens in a society, with each cell having autonomy from the larger body (Reynolds, 2007 ). Since then, many diseases have been considered to have cell-autonomous etiologies and outcomes, with the assumption that pathology is caused by damage to a specific class of autonomous cells.…”
Section: Non-autonomous Cellular Disease Pathologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly through the influence of Rudolf Virchow (1821-1902), who since the 1850s had compared the body’s cells with citizens cooperatively forming a state (‘cell state’, ‘Zellenstaat’), it had become customary to speak metaphorically of cells as human individuals. 11 As Virchow had argued in his influential Cellularpathologie :…”
Section: Ernst Haeckel and The ‘Stammzelle’mentioning
confidence: 99%