Ferdinand Tönnies Community and Civil Society 2001
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511816260.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The theory of Gemeinschaft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most portrayals of the community lost tradition associate its origins with the writings in the late 1800s of Tonnies (1963), who used the term Gemeinschaft to characterize the cohesive nature of life found among preindustrial societies and Gesellschaft to describe the opposite conditions within communities of industrialized societies. Tonnies characterizes Gemeinschaft society as small, isolated, homogeneous communities in which the fundamental building blocks are common goals and common backgrounds.…”
Section: Previous Theorizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most portrayals of the community lost tradition associate its origins with the writings in the late 1800s of Tonnies (1963), who used the term Gemeinschaft to characterize the cohesive nature of life found among preindustrial societies and Gesellschaft to describe the opposite conditions within communities of industrialized societies. Tonnies characterizes Gemeinschaft society as small, isolated, homogeneous communities in which the fundamental building blocks are common goals and common backgrounds.…”
Section: Previous Theorizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinctive features of modernity are: within the political spherea democratic, constitutional state; within the sphere of nation-buildinga transition to a national government; within the spheres of science and educationa formation of autonomous studies; and within the economic spherea transition to capitalism. Many theorists wrote about the differences and interactions within the premodern (preindustrial) and modern societies in the nineteenth century (Tönnies, 1887;Spencer, 1873;Durkheim, 1893;Comte, 1853). Changes in the sphere of religion are of particular significance: modernity is considered to have came into being because people had taken the world out of God's hands, as it were, while still providing possible manifestations of enchantment in the form of contingent meaning.…”
Section: Defining Modernizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental contributions to the formation of scientific concepts explaining the macroprocess of modernization, i.e., the transition from traditional to modern society (Comte, 1853;Spencer, 1873;Weber, 1905;Durkheim, 1893;Tönnies, 1887;Cooley, 1918;Maine, 1861). Fundamental contributions to the formation of scientific concepts explaining the macroprocess of modernization, i.e., the transition from traditional to modern society (Comte, 1853;Spencer, 1873;Weber, 1905;Durkheim, 1893;Tönnies, 1887;Cooley, 1918;Maine, 1861).…”
Section: The History Of the Study Of Modernizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La cuestión territorial se resalta como factor explicativo, ya que, como consecuencia de los procesos de colonización, la reserva de Cristianía es la tercera más pequeña de toda la nación 23 . Las diferencias en el acceso a la educación que reporta la literatura como una de las variables mas relacionadas con la fecundidad, y que presenta diferencias frente a los demás grupos étnicos de Antioquia.…”
Section: Consideraciones Finalesunclassified