2003
DOI: 10.1080/07481756.2003.12069085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Theoretical Orientation Profile Scale—Revised: A Validation Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Internal consistency reliabilities for the theoretical orientation scales ranged from .80 (multicultural) to .93 (feminist) in the student sample, and from .85 (multicultural) to .95 (feminist) in the practitioner sample. These high reliability coefficients are comparable to those reported by Worthington and Dillon ().…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Internal consistency reliabilities for the theoretical orientation scales ranged from .80 (multicultural) to .93 (feminist) in the student sample, and from .85 (multicultural) to .95 (feminist) in the practitioner sample. These high reliability coefficients are comparable to those reported by Worthington and Dillon ().…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Participants completed a measure adapted from the Theoretical Orientation Profile Scale‐ Revised (TOPS‐R; Worthington & Dillon, ). The TOPS‐R was designed to measure six theoretical orientations: psychoanalytic or psychodynamic, humanistic/existential, cognitive‐behavioural, family systems, multicultural, and feminist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To aid in interpreting the findings, we summed and averaged the scores for each subscale, with scores ranging from 1 to 5. Worthington and Dillon (2003) found through an exploratory factor analysis that a six-factor solution accounted for 87.5% of the explained variance with factor loadings ranging from .86 to .96 and no cross loading across the factors. Worthington and Dillon also found evidence for concurrent validity of the TOPS-R through correlations of the subscales with subscales on the Etiology Attribution Scale (Worthington, 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Theoretical Orientation Profile Scale (TOPS)-Revised. The TOPS developed by Worthington and Dillon (2003) measures counselors' theoretical orientation across 18 items based on a 10point, Likert-type scale. In the original version, the measure consisted of six subscales with 3 items each that measure the following theoretical orientations: Cognitive/Behavioral, Multicultural, Family Systems, Humanistic/Existential, Psychoanalytic/Psychodynamic, and Feminist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%