The Theft of the Pārijāta Tree in Early Sanskrit Sources

Abstract

The Pārijātaharaṇa or theft of the magical Pārijāta tree is a well known episode in the life of the Hindu god Kṛṣṇa. The earliest Sanskrit sources of the incident consist largely of short or passing references to the deed, and mainly understand the seizure of the tree to have involved a fight between Kṛṣṇa and Indra. The actual episode is narrated in the critical text of the Harivaṃśa, but there no fight occurs. This piece follows up on and responds to a recent publication in this journal in which the narrative discontinuity surrounding the Pārijātaharaṇa is treated briefly in connection with the problem of textual emendation. After identifying and contextualizing the relevant epic passages, I take up the key sources of the myth in the following centuries, and reflect briefly on the issue of the Sanskrit tradition's own work of narrative emendation, as well as some of the implications thereof for readers and translators.

The eropolitical compound: immanence, transcendence and a parasitic operation of patriarchy in Sanskrit literature

“…But this of course won't do: where a feminized object of auspiciousness is seized or appropriated by a virile male, surely there must be male-on-male violence. As such, later Harivaṃśa poets developed an extensive recasting of the scene ( Harivaṃśa Appendix I.29–29A; Austin 2013; 2020) in which the tree's feminine nature and significance within the domestic space of women's duties and ideals were greatly enhanced and made explicit, with Satyabhāmā's prompting role substantially developed, and of course a spectacular battle between Kṛṣṇa and Indra elaborated. This then provides us with the preferred configuration of a masculine power proving itself through the violent domination of a rival male in the acquisition of a feminine and sexualized object of domestic auspiciousness.…”