2020
DOI: 10.18357/bigr21202019851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The The Swiss–French Border Closure During COVID-19: A Cross-border Worker’s View

Abstract: This paper examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Swiss–French border in the Geneva region. This cross-border metropolitan area, which is structured by many cross-border flows, transcends the boundary line. The paper presents testimony of Clément Montcharmont, who works in Geneva and lives in France and was much impacted by the closing of the border

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most striking phenomenon was the physical and administrative sealing of borders: Member States strongly limited border crossing in order to prevent the spread of the virus, sometimes by placing physical barriers on the roads (Peyrony et al, 2021). Even borders that had been permanently open since the end of World War II, like the French-Swiss one, were closed (Beylier 2020;Peyrony et al 2021). In many cases, cross-border public transport services were suspended.…”
Section: Border Regime and Cross-border Mobility During The Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most striking phenomenon was the physical and administrative sealing of borders: Member States strongly limited border crossing in order to prevent the spread of the virus, sometimes by placing physical barriers on the roads (Peyrony et al, 2021). Even borders that had been permanently open since the end of World War II, like the French-Swiss one, were closed (Beylier 2020;Peyrony et al 2021). In many cases, cross-border public transport services were suspended.…”
Section: Border Regime and Cross-border Mobility During The Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What was even worse, the member states introduced their provisions without coordinating them with their neighbours, nor the European Commission (Albers et al 2021;EC 2021;ECA 2022). This unilateralism (Böhm 2020;Carrera and Luk 2020;Coatleven et al 2020;Giacometti and Meijer 2021;Hennig 2021;Weber 2022), the "state-centric, inward-looking responses" (Giacometti and Meijer 2021, 12) not only facilitated the "renationalization of the border regions" (Coatleven et al 2020, 17) but, in a certain way, they also brought back the past, as several border citizens mentioned (Beylier 2020;Böhm 2020;Buko 2020;CESCI 2021;Giacometti and Meijer 2021;Peyrony et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%