1985
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90580-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The TeV physics of strongly interacting W's and Z's

Abstract: There are two possibilities for electroweak symmetry breaking: either there is a scalar particle much lighter than 1 TeV or the longitudinal components of W and Z bosons interact strongly at center of mass energies of order 1 TeV or more. We study the general signatures of a strongly interacting W, Z system and conclude that these two possibilities can be unambiguously distinguished by a hadron collider facility capable of observing the enhanced production of WW, W Z and Z Z pairs that will occur if W's and Z'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
809
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 874 publications
(832 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
22
809
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the program does not contain W L or Z L distributions inside hadrons, the basic hard scattering has to be convoluted with the q → q ′ W L and q → qZ L branchings, to yield effective 2 → 3 and 2 → 4 processes. However, it is possible to integrate out the scattering angles of the quarks analytically, as well as one energy-sharing variable [Cha85]. Only after an event has been accepted are these other kinematical variables selected.…”
Section: → 3 and 2 → 4 Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the program does not contain W L or Z L distributions inside hadrons, the basic hard scattering has to be convoluted with the q → q ′ W L and q → qZ L branchings, to yield effective 2 → 3 and 2 → 4 processes. However, it is possible to integrate out the scattering angles of the quarks analytically, as well as one energy-sharing variable [Cha85]. Only after an event has been accepted are these other kinematical variables selected.…”
Section: → 3 and 2 → 4 Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We label those scalars as ϕ ± . If physical justification is needed, the massless scalars can be thought of as longitudinal modes of Wbosons; treating longitudinal W -bosons as massless scalar particles in Higgs boson decays is justified by the Equivalence Theorem [115,116] in the limit m H ≫ m W . We will denote the coupling of the massless scalars to the Higgs boson as g H , so that the Hϕ 2 vertex is −ig H .…”
Section: Higgs Decay To Two Photons Through Massless Scalarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chanowitz and Galliard have given a careful statement and proof of this theorem, valid for any number of vector bosons [20]. A surprising consequence of the GBET is seen in top quark decay.…”
Section: Goldstone Boson Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%