1981
DOI: 10.1021/ja00394a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tetradecaisopropoxydihydridotetratungsten story

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“….747 (2), W(3)-W(4) = 2.795 (2) , W(l)-C(55) = 1.914 ( 14), W(2)-C(55) = 1.956 (15), W(3)-C(55) The W4CN012 skeleton of I is shown in Figure 1. The molecule bears a striking resemblance to the well-known "ironbutterfly" Fe4(g-C)(CO)13.7 If, for the sake of electron counting, charge is partitioned between the metal atoms and the ligands as C4-, NMe2-, and OR-, then the tetranuclear center is formally W418+ having only 6 electrons for M-M cluster bonding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“….747 (2), W(3)-W(4) = 2.795 (2) , W(l)-C(55) = 1.914 ( 14), W(2)-C(55) = 1.956 (15), W(3)-C(55) The W4CN012 skeleton of I is shown in Figure 1. The molecule bears a striking resemblance to the well-known "ironbutterfly" Fe4(g-C)(CO)13.7 If, for the sake of electron counting, charge is partitioned between the metal atoms and the ligands as C4-, NMe2-, and OR-, then the tetranuclear center is formally W418+ having only 6 electrons for M-M cluster bonding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By changing the stoichiometry to that shown in eq 2, II may be 2) isolated in ca. 60% yield based on Mo after recrystallization from hot hexane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70.8 ( 7) 73.4 (11) C( 6) W( 1) 0(8) 82.7 ( 4) 86.6 (6) W(l) 0( 8) 0( 7) 73.3 (8) 70.6 (11) C( 7) W( 1) 0( 8) 35.9 (5) 36.0 (6) C( 8) 0( 7) 0(37) 133.3 (17) 0( 17) W( 2) 0( 21) 87.3 (3) 93.0 ( 5) C( 7) 0( 8) C( 38) 139.0 (17) 0( 17) W( 2) 0( 25 C-C-C angles of the alkyne ligand are in the range 133-139°, quite markedly bent from linearity. The acetylenic C-C distance, 1.28 Á, while significantly longer than in a typical free alkyne, 1.21 A, are not nearly lengthened as much as the µ-€2 2 alkynes discussed previously.1,2 (4) The terminal W-OR distances, which fall within the range 1.90-1.93 A, are typical of W-O distances having some rr-character7 while the distances to the bridging OR ligand, 0 (17), are longer and asymmetric with the W(2)-0 (17) distances being more than 0.1 A shorter than the W(l)-0(17)…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This, together Table I. Fractional Coordinates and Isotropic Thermal Parameters for the W2(0-i-Pr)6(C4H4)(C2H2) Molecule" atom 4* W4y 104z 105iso, A2 W(l) 7465.5 (3) 683.6 (4) (1) 12 W(2) 7678.3 (3) C( 15) 7114 ( 9) 3666 (11) (15) 24 C( 16) 5947 ( 8) 4290 (11) (15) 23 0 (17) 8459 (5) -862 (7) (9) 14 C( 18) 9387 25 " Isotropic values for those atoms refined anistropically are calculated by using the formula given by: Hamilton, W. C. Acta Crystallogr. 1959, 12, 609. with NMR spectra, show that the p-C4 ligand is formed by a simple coupling of C-C bonds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W H (u-H) 2 (0-i-Pr) llt (30) is one of the very few transition metal hydrido alkoxides that have been claimed in the litera ture (58,59).…”
Section: Cffisholmmentioning
confidence: 99%