2016
DOI: 10.15412/j.ptj.07050406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity and 9-Hole Pegboard Test in Individuals With Subacute Stroke

Abstract: Purpose: The first step to manage motor impairment of upper limb in patients with subacute stroke is having an accurate assessment tool. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper extremity and 9-hole pegboard test are used to evaluate motor function and hand dexterity in stroke survivals. The present study aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) in these two tests. Methods:A total of 15 patients with subacute stroke (54-76 years old) participated in this study. They were s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UE-FM is a valid and reliable assessment of performance-based impairment after stroke, measured on 0–3 ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform; 3 = performs faultlessly) with a maximum possible score of 66 points ( Gladstone et al, 2002 ; Hsieh et al, 2009 ; Kim et al, 2012 ). The MDC (Minimum Detectable Change) is 1.56 points and the MCID (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) is 4.25 points ( Page et al, 2012 ; Toluee Achacheluee et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UE-FM is a valid and reliable assessment of performance-based impairment after stroke, measured on 0–3 ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform; 3 = performs faultlessly) with a maximum possible score of 66 points ( Gladstone et al, 2002 ; Hsieh et al, 2009 ; Kim et al, 2012 ). The MDC (Minimum Detectable Change) is 1.56 points and the MCID (Minimal Clinically Important Difference) is 4.25 points ( Page et al, 2012 ; Toluee Achacheluee et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient should use problem-solving skills and self-monitoring to transfer the interventions to daily living activities, but these patients refuse to use the affected hand due to motor and functional limitations; hence, in the long term, they will not get acceptable outcome from this intervention [29]. However, studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation have shown an increase in short-term [32] and long-term [33] activity of cerebral cortex after modified CIMT. Therefore, the long-term outcome of modified CIMT is not clear yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we will utilize the wrist position sense test (24)and hand active sensation test (25) to assess sensory function. Additionally, we will employ the box & block test (26), grip dynamometer test (27,28), Purdue Pegboard test (29), Nine-Hole Peg test (30,31), and coin rotation test (32,33) to evaluate fine and gross motor function.…”
Section: Sensory-motor Skills Of Upper Extremitymentioning
confidence: 99%