The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the five times sit to stand test and step test in older adults with total hip arthroplasty

Özden, Fatih; Coşkun, Gökhan; Bakırhan, Serkan

doi:10.1016/j.exger.2020.111143

Cited by 19 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…ST was also found to be highly reliable in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty studies (>0.80). 24,25 In the present study, SEM and MDC values of the ST (right) were 0.65 and 1.80, respectively. Also, SEM and MDC values of the ST (left) were 0.64 and 1.77, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 49%

“…34 The validity and reliability of the ST test have so far been demonstrated in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. 24,25 In our study, we demonstrated the validity and reliability of ST in addition to mFSST. Accordingly, we purposed to strengthen the validation of these two common step performance assessment tools by calculating the relationship between them.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 50%

“…mFSST and ST are frequently used in clinical practice and research studies. 7,18,24,25 The researchers or clinicians should prefer to use these tests with their relevant standardized protocols. 33 Therefore, our study is essential in terms of its statistical structure belongs to reliability and validity of the test procedure in older adults.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Also, ST is another common and practical test that evaluates step-taking performance. 24,25 It has been demonstrated that step-taking performance mostly represents dynamic balance and has an important place in balance training in order to prevent falls in older adults. 34 The validity and reliability of the ST test have so far been demonstrated in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…24 In the validation study of total hip arthroplasty, SEM, and MDC value interval was 0.37 and 1.52 for the right and left lower extremities, respectively. 25 We compared ST (right) with TUG, FTST and mFSST to demonstrate its validity (r 1 = −0.551, r 2 = −0.553, r 3 =0.627, p < 0.001). Also, the relationship between ST (left) with TUG, FTST and mFSST was calculated (r 1 = −0.578, r 2 = −0.527, r 3 =0.650, p < 0.001).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Reliability and Validity of Modified Four-Square-Step-Test and Step-Test in Older Adults

Özkeskin

Özden

Tuna

2021

Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims: To demonstrate the reliability and validity of the modified four-square step test (mFSST) and the step test (ST) in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: Fifty older adults were recruited. The test-retest reliability of the mFSST and ST was evaluated with one-hour-interval. The mFSST and ST was compared with Timed up and Go Test (TUG) and Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTST) to demonstrate concurrent validity. Results: The mean age of the participants was 72.0 ± 5.7 years. The test-retest reliability of mFSST and ST was excellent (ICC = 0.971 and 0.938, respectively). In concurrent validity analysis, the mFSST was strongly correlated with TUG and FTST (r 1 =0.755,r 2 =0.575,p < 0.001). Both the ST (right) and ST (left) were highly correlated with TUG and FTST (r= −0.527 to −0.578, p < 0.001). In addition, the ST (right) and ST (left) were highly correlated with FTST (r 1 = −0.533,r 2 = −0.527,p < 0.001). Conclusions: mFSST and ST was proven to be valid and reliable in older adults.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 49%